Re: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 08/11] bpf: Restore trace->nr value properly in bpf_get_stack_pe

Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.bpf
Message-ID <amykNotpsnxhWNYI@krava>
On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 04:01:28PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 1:39 AM Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > In bpf_get_stack_pe The __bpf_get_stack call changes trace->nr value,
> > so both kernel and user path need to restore its value back.
> >
> 
> something feels off here, this trace_in->nr restoration just in
> bpf_get_stack_pe is weird. maybe we should either make sure
> __bpf_get_stack doesn't modify trace_in->nr or restores it before
> returning to bpf_get_stack_pe()?..

I think it'd be cleaner not to modify the trace->nr and just
pass the wanted count as argument, will check

jirka

> 
> > Reported-by: Sashiko <[email protected]>
> > Fixes: e17d62fedd10 ("bpf: Refactor stack map trace depth calculation into helper function")
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 14 ++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> > index 05269f2a9e08..875f530f3597 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> > @@ -942,9 +942,9 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_get_stack_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
> >         struct pt_regs *regs = (struct pt_regs *)(ctx->regs);
> >         struct perf_event *event = ctx->event;
> >         struct perf_callchain_entry *trace;
> > +       __u64 nr, nr_kernel;
> >         bool kernel, user;
> >         int err = -EINVAL;
> > -       __u64 nr_kernel;
> >
> >         if (!(event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN))
> >                 return __bpf_get_stack(regs, NULL, NULL, buf, size, flags, false /* !may_fault */);
> > @@ -962,15 +962,12 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_get_stack_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
> >                 goto clear;
> >
> >         nr_kernel = count_kernel_ip(trace);
> > +       nr = trace->nr;
> >
> >         if (kernel) {
> > -               __u64 nr = trace->nr;
> > -
> >                 trace->nr = nr_kernel;
> >                 err = __bpf_get_stack(regs, NULL, trace, buf, size, flags, false /* !may_fault */);
> >
> > -               /* restore nr */
> > -               trace->nr = nr;
> >         } else { /* user */
> >                 u64 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
> >
> > @@ -981,12 +978,13 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_get_stack_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx,
> >                 flags = (flags & ~BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK) | skip;
> >                 err = __bpf_get_stack(regs, NULL, trace, buf, size, flags, false /* !may_fault */);
> >         }
> > -       return err;
> >
> > +       /* restore nr */
> > +       trace->nr = nr;
> >  clear:
> > -       memset(buf, 0, size);
> > +       if (err < 0)
> > +               memset(buf, 0, size);
> >         return err;
> > -
> >  }
> >
> >  const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_stack_proto_pe = {
> > --
> > 2.54.0
> >
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.