[PATCH bpf-next v3 08/18] bpf: Check fixed-size mem args of helpers and kfuncs the same way

Amery Hung <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Aug 2026 00:46:23 -0700
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.bpf
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Fixed-size memory arguments went through two paths: helpers called
check_helper_mem_access() directly, while kfuncs and global subprogs
used check_mem_reg(). Route the helper MEM_FIXED_SIZE case through
check_mem_reg() too so all three share the same check.

This also fixes a bug in the helper path. When passing a NULL to
PTR_MAYBE_NULL | ARG_PTR_TO_FIXED_SIZE_MEM argument, the program would
be falsely rejected by check_helper_mem_access(). This is not
triggerable since there is no such kind of helper. Also, note that
check_reg_type() still make sure NULL cannot be passed to an argument
not marked with PTR_MAYBE_NULL.

It also tightens the poisoned-stack-slot check. check_mem_reg() encoded
"a STACK_POISON slot may be read" as a negative access size for any
PTR_TO_STACK argument, but that is only sound for global subprogs, where
static stack liveness proved the callee body does not read those slots
(2cb27158adb3 ("bpf: poison dead stack slots")). Since check_mem_reg() is
also used for kfuncs, kfuncs accidentally inherited it and could read a
poisoned (dead, possibly uninitialized) stack slot. Restrict the negative
size to global subprogs (meta == NULL) so kfuncs, like helpers, require
the whole argument initialized.

Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index cb805bc97604..e1d4820d19ff 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6669,7 +6669,7 @@ static int check_stack_range_initialized(
 	 */
 	bool clobber = type == BPF_WRITE;
 	/*
-	 * Negative access_size signals global subprog/kfunc arg check where
+	 * Negative access_size signals global subprog arg check where
 	 * STACK_POISON slots are acceptable. static stack liveness
 	 * might have determined that subprog doesn't read them,
 	 * but BTF based global subprog validation isn't accurate enough.
@@ -6933,9 +6933,10 @@ static int check_mem_size_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 }
 
 static int check_mem_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
-			 argno_t argno, u32 mem_size, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
+			 argno_t argno, u32 mem_size, enum bpf_access_type access_type,
+			 struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
 {
-	int err;
+	int size, err = 0;
 
 	if (bpf_register_is_null(reg))
 		return 0;
@@ -6946,10 +6947,16 @@ static int check_mem_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg
 		return -EACCES;
 	}
 
-	int size = base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_STACK ? -(int)mem_size : mem_size;
+	/*
+	 * Only a global subprog (meta == NULL) may read poisoned stack slots:
+	 * its static stack liveness proved the callee body skips them.
+	 */
+	size = (!meta && base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_STACK) ? -(int)mem_size : mem_size;
 
-	err = check_helper_mem_access(env, reg, argno, size, BPF_READ, true, meta);
-	err = err ?: check_helper_mem_access(env, reg, argno, size, BPF_WRITE, true, meta);
+	if (access_type & BPF_READ)
+		err = check_helper_mem_access(env, reg, argno, size, BPF_READ, true, meta);
+	if (!err && (access_type & BPF_WRITE))
+		err = check_helper_mem_access(env, reg, argno, size, BPF_WRITE, true, meta);
 
 	return err;
 }
@@ -8455,9 +8462,8 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg,
 		 * next is_mem_size argument below.
 		 */
 		if (arg_type & MEM_FIXED_SIZE) {
-			err = check_helper_mem_access(env, reg, argno, fn->arg_size[arg],
-						      arg_type & MEM_WRITE ? BPF_WRITE : BPF_READ,
-						      false, meta);
+			err = check_mem_reg(env, reg, argno_from_reg(regno), fn->arg_size[arg],
+					    arg_type & MEM_WRITE ? BPF_WRITE : BPF_READ, meta);
 			if (err)
 				return err;
 			if (arg_type & MEM_ALIGNED)
@@ -9229,7 +9235,7 @@ static int btf_check_func_arg_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog,
 			ret = check_func_arg_reg_off(env, reg, argno, ARG_DONTCARE);
 			if (ret < 0)
 				return ret;
-			if (check_mem_reg(env, reg, argno, arg->mem_size, NULL))
+			if (check_mem_reg(env, reg, argno, arg->mem_size, BPF_READ | BPF_WRITE, NULL))
 				return -EINVAL;
 			if (!(arg->arg_type & PTR_MAYBE_NULL) &&
 			    (type_may_be_null(reg->type) || bpf_register_is_null(reg))) {
@@ -12379,7 +12385,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_call_arg_me
 					ref_tname, PTR_ERR(resolve_ret));
 				return -EINVAL;
 			}
-			ret = check_mem_reg(env, reg, argno, type_size, meta);
+			ret = check_mem_reg(env, reg, argno, type_size, BPF_READ | BPF_WRITE, meta);
 			if (ret < 0)
 				return ret;
 			break;
-- 
2.52.0