[PATCH bpf-next v3 08/18] bpf: Check fixed-size mem args of helpers and kfuncs the same way
Amery Hung <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Aug 2026 00:46:23 -0700
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.bpf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Fixed-size memory arguments went through two paths: helpers called
check_helper_mem_access() directly, while kfuncs and global subprogs
used check_mem_reg(). Route the helper MEM_FIXED_SIZE case through
check_mem_reg() too so all three share the same check.
This also fixes a bug in the helper path. When passing a NULL to
PTR_MAYBE_NULL | ARG_PTR_TO_FIXED_SIZE_MEM argument, the program would
be falsely rejected by check_helper_mem_access(). This is not
triggerable since there is no such kind of helper. Also, note that
check_reg_type() still make sure NULL cannot be passed to an argument
not marked with PTR_MAYBE_NULL.
It also tightens the poisoned-stack-slot check. check_mem_reg() encoded
"a STACK_POISON slot may be read" as a negative access size for any
PTR_TO_STACK argument, but that is only sound for global subprogs, where
static stack liveness proved the callee body does not read those slots
(2cb27158adb3 ("bpf: poison dead stack slots")). Since check_mem_reg() is
also used for kfuncs, kfuncs accidentally inherited it and could read a
poisoned (dead, possibly uninitialized) stack slot. Restrict the negative
size to global subprogs (meta == NULL) so kfuncs, like helpers, require
the whole argument initialized.
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <[email protected]>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index cb805bc97604..e1d4820d19ff 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6669,7 +6669,7 @@ static int check_stack_range_initialized(
*/
bool clobber = type == BPF_WRITE;
/*
- * Negative access_size signals global subprog/kfunc arg check where
+ * Negative access_size signals global subprog arg check where
* STACK_POISON slots are acceptable. static stack liveness
* might have determined that subprog doesn't read them,
* but BTF based global subprog validation isn't accurate enough.
@@ -6933,9 +6933,10 @@ static int check_mem_size_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
}
static int check_mem_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
- argno_t argno, u32 mem_size, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
+ argno_t argno, u32 mem_size, enum bpf_access_type access_type,
+ struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
{
- int err;
+ int size, err = 0;
if (bpf_register_is_null(reg))
return 0;
@@ -6946,10 +6947,16 @@ static int check_mem_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg
return -EACCES;
}
- int size = base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_STACK ? -(int)mem_size : mem_size;
+ /*
+ * Only a global subprog (meta == NULL) may read poisoned stack slots:
+ * its static stack liveness proved the callee body skips them.
+ */
+ size = (!meta && base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_STACK) ? -(int)mem_size : mem_size;
- err = check_helper_mem_access(env, reg, argno, size, BPF_READ, true, meta);
- err = err ?: check_helper_mem_access(env, reg, argno, size, BPF_WRITE, true, meta);
+ if (access_type & BPF_READ)
+ err = check_helper_mem_access(env, reg, argno, size, BPF_READ, true, meta);
+ if (!err && (access_type & BPF_WRITE))
+ err = check_helper_mem_access(env, reg, argno, size, BPF_WRITE, true, meta);
return err;
}
@@ -8455,9 +8462,8 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg,
* next is_mem_size argument below.
*/
if (arg_type & MEM_FIXED_SIZE) {
- err = check_helper_mem_access(env, reg, argno, fn->arg_size[arg],
- arg_type & MEM_WRITE ? BPF_WRITE : BPF_READ,
- false, meta);
+ err = check_mem_reg(env, reg, argno_from_reg(regno), fn->arg_size[arg],
+ arg_type & MEM_WRITE ? BPF_WRITE : BPF_READ, meta);
if (err)
return err;
if (arg_type & MEM_ALIGNED)
@@ -9229,7 +9235,7 @@ static int btf_check_func_arg_match(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog,
ret = check_func_arg_reg_off(env, reg, argno, ARG_DONTCARE);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- if (check_mem_reg(env, reg, argno, arg->mem_size, NULL))
+ if (check_mem_reg(env, reg, argno, arg->mem_size, BPF_READ | BPF_WRITE, NULL))
return -EINVAL;
if (!(arg->arg_type & PTR_MAYBE_NULL) &&
(type_may_be_null(reg->type) || bpf_register_is_null(reg))) {
@@ -12379,7 +12385,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_call_arg_me
ref_tname, PTR_ERR(resolve_ret));
return -EINVAL;
}
- ret = check_mem_reg(env, reg, argno, type_size, meta);
+ ret = check_mem_reg(env, reg, argno, type_size, BPF_READ | BPF_WRITE, meta);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
break;
--
2.52.0