Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] LoongArch: BPF: per-CPU address resolution and timed may_goto
George Guo <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Aug 2026 17:10:30 +0800
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.bpf,dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Huacai, On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 3:11 PM, Huacai Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > In V1 it is independent, > In V2 it is part of [...] the 11-patch series > In V3 it is independent again. > > What do you want? You are right that the v1 -> v2 -> v3 shape looks inconsistent. The plan has always been incremental: Tiezhu suggested sending this work as small, stacked series -- A first, then B rebased on A, then C on B -- so each round stays small enough to review carefully. My v2 bundled all 11 patches to show the full picture, but that was too large to review effectively, so v3 goes back to the incremental approach. Concretely, this 2-patch series (per-CPU MOV + timed may_goto) is A. The remaining pieces -- private stack, exceptions/bpf_throw, arena LDSX and atomics, and the matching selftests -- will follow as separate series stacked on top of it. The structure stays incremental from here. > You can ask Tiezhu and Hengqi to review your patches, but don't do such > confusing things. Understood. I will keep the split stable and ask Tiezhu and Hengqi to review this batch. Thanks, George