Re: [PATCH RFC] arm64: entry: PSTATE_I_SET is leaking on pseudo NMI mode
Will Deacon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ansIT2PCHq_EKuTE@willie-the-truck> |
On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 05:39:52PM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote: > On 8/10/26 16:05, Will Deacon wrote: > > So we could probably hack something as you suggest, but maybe the best > > option is to take patches 8 and 9 from your FEAT_NMI series? WDYT? > > > > Whatever you prefer, tbh :) > > Patch 9 codifies my understanding of how things are expected to > work. That said, I accept that I could be missing something, hence the > RFC tag. Those two look fine to me and I already took the preceding changes. > In case you decide to take it, we probably need to: > > - extend the commit message to cover Breno's report (right now, the > commit message makes it look like a refactoring) > > - add Fixes tags if we want it to be backported > > Alternatively, I can respin the patch separately with the suggestions > above applied - just let me know ;) Lemme have a go at picking them up... I'll yell if it all goes horribly wrong! Will