Re: [PATCH RFC] arm64: entry: PSTATE_I_SET is leaking on pseudo NMI mode
Vladimir Murzin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/11/26 12:32, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 05:39:52PM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote: >> On 8/10/26 16:05, Will Deacon wrote: >> > So we could probably hack something as you suggest, but maybe the best >>> option is to take patches 8 and 9 from your FEAT_NMI series? WDYT? >>> >> Whatever you prefer, tbh :) >> >> Patch 9 codifies my understanding of how things are expected to >> work. That said, I accept that I could be missing something, hence the >> RFC tag. > Those two look fine to me and I already took the preceding changes. > >> In case you decide to take it, we probably need to: >> >> - extend the commit message to cover Breno's report (right now, the >> commit message makes it look like a refactoring) >> >> - add Fixes tags if we want it to be backported >> >> Alternatively, I can respin the patch separately with the suggestions >> above applied - just let me know ;) > Lemme have a go at picking them up... I'll yell if it all goes horribly > wrong! > Ready, steady... :D More than happy to help if those go wrong. Cheers Vladimir > Will >