Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Cancel special fields in resizable hashtab on recycle

"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.bpf
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue Aug 11, 2026 at 11:55 AM CEST, chenyuan_fl wrote:
> From: Yuan Chen <[email protected]>
>
> The resizable hashtab (BPF_MAP_TYPE_RHASH) still eagerly calls
> bpf_obj_free_fields() when an element is deleted or its value is
> replaced, which runs kptr destructors in the caller's execution context.
> This is unsafe for BPF programs running in NMI context (e.g. perf_event
> programs attached to hardware PMU overflows), where referenced kptr
> destructors may take locks or otherwise cannot run.
>
> Commit a3a81d247651 ("bpf: Cancel special fields on map value recycle")
> switched the hash map and array recycle paths to bpf_obj_cancel_fields(),
> which only cancels NMI-safe fields (timer, workqueue, task_work), but it
> missed the resizable hashtab. Patch 1 applies the same semantics to
> rhtab; patch 2 adds a regression test.
>
> Yuan Chen (2):
>   bpf: Cancel special fields in resizable hashtab on recycle
>   selftests/bpf: Test rhtab kptr recycle from NMI context
>

At least go through the mailing list before sending patches.

https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]

pw-bot: cr

>  kernel/bpf/hashtab.c                          |  28 +++--
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rhtab_kptr.c     |  87 +++++++++++++++
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rhtab_kptr.c  | 101 ++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 207 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rhtab_kptr.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rhtab_kptr.c
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.