Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpf: Compare iterator types during state pruning

[email protected]
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest
Message-ID <178648561523.1170542.5254278257474503414.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>:

On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 20:59:53 -0700 you wrote:
> Iterator stack slots can be marked MEM_RCU or PTR_UNTRUSTED. The
> STACK_ITER check in stacksafe() does not compare this type, so state
> pruning can treat these states as equal and prune an unsafe path.
> 
> Compare the type and add a test where RCU protection has a gap.
> 
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v2,1/2] bpf: Compare iterator types during state pruning
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/83608e303b95
  - [bpf-next,v2,2/2] selftests/bpf: Test RCU iterator state pruning
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/81f209d5f743

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.