Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add ksock test for async callback guard

[email protected]
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.netdev
Message-ID <427cd292151a90f499819620700c9c582f1b63348d91d8727eee4200c268200e@mail.kernel.org>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksock_wq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksock_wq.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..5b9c6cc303922
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksock_wq.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2026 Isovalent */
> +
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +
> +#include "test_progs.h"
> +#include "ksock_wq.skel.h"
> +
> +void test_ksock_wq(void)
> +{
> +	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, opts);
> +	struct ksock_wq *skel;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	skel = ksock_wq__open_and_load();
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "ksock_wq open and load"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(
> +		bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.ksock_wq_start), &opts);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "run ksock_wq_start"))
> +		goto out;
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "ksock_wq_start retval"))
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	while (!__atomic_load_n(&skel->bss->callback_done, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE))
> +		usleep(1000);

What happens if the workqueue callback never runs or blocks? This loop is
unbounded, so the test would hang forever rather than failing. test_progs
has no per-test timeout, so a hang here would block the entire test run.

Adding an iteration cap (e.g. a bounded retry count followed by an ASSERT
on callback_done) would turn a CI hang into a normal test failure. For
comparison, prog_tests/wq.c uses a bounded usleep(50) before asserting.

> +
> +	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->create_err, -EOPNOTSUPP,
> +		  "workqueue create rejected");
> +
> +out:
> +	ksock_wq__destroy(skel);
> +}

[ ... ]


---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md

CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/31618864886
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.