Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 11/13] selftests/bpf: Add inline-asm and subprog tests for R0:R2 returns

On Wed, 2026-08-12 at 14:08 -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:

...

> > test_progs tracks whether bpf_testmod.ko is loaded in env.has_testmod
> > and sets it to false if load_bpf_testmod() fails. Every other
> > testmod-dependent test in the tree checks both the architecture
> > capability and env.has_testmod before attempting to use testmod kfuncs.
> > Examples include bpf_cookie.c, iters.c, ksyms_module.c, btf_module.c,
> > btf_tag.c, tp_btf_nullable.c, module_fentry_shadow.c, and
> > core_reloc.c.
> > 
> > Should test_run() fold env.has_testmod into its guard to match the
> > established pattern, so that the test skips cleanly in all environments
> > where bpf_testmod is unavailable?
> 
> Yes, we should add env.has_testmod.

Note that env.has_testmod handling is inconsistent across the testsuite.
If anything, I think this flag has to be dropped entirely.
I'd suggest to ignore this llm suggestion.