Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 13/14] bpf: Distinguish function references in policy diagnostics

On Sun, 2026-08-16 at 03:57 +0200, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> add_subprogs() rejects both BPF-to-BPF calls and BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC loads for
> unprivileged programs. The latter loads a subprogram address for use as a
> callback, but its Policy report currently describes it as a function call and
> suggests avoiding calls that the program does not contain.
> 
> Select the operation and suggestion from the instruction kind. Preserve the
> existing call wording for BPF_PSEUDO_CALL, and describe BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC as a
> BPF function reference.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/d02e6a6d3b2dc43a207b8ba836ce62497b250dede9252e7409c5212201c794b7@mail.kernel.org/
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
> ---

As you see fit, but I think the original bot complaint was too picky. I'd drop this patch.

...