Re: [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Exercise negative optlen in cgroup getsockopt hook
Junseo Lim <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aoKQ04mN7zzWAqkI@hp-zirajs> |
On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 03:10:47PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > Is the intent that this test relies on WARN/taint detection or > panic_on_warn, or is the value of the test primarily as a WARN-only > reproducer rather than a pass/fail assertion? Yes, the intent is for this to serve as a reproducer for the WARN rather than a pass/fail regression test. A clear pass/fail verdict would be preferable, but that does not seem feasible here since EFAULT is returned regardless of the patch. Another option would be to add a KUnit test for the negative optlen validation, but that seemed excessive for this fix.