Re: [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf, veth: xdp: fix page_pool page leak on skb-backed XDP
Jiayuan Chen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/24/26 6:31 PM, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
>> bpf_xdp_shrink_data() frees a released frag via __xdp_return() using
>> xdp->rxq->mem.type, but that type is wrong for skb-backed XDP: the skb is
>> cow'd into page_pool memory while the rxq still says MEM_TYPE_PAGE_SHARED,
>> so the page_pool page is freed with page_frag_free() and we hit
>> "Bad page state ... page_pool leak".
>>
>> Both generic XDP and veth are affected. A non-linear skb is cow'd into
>> page_pool memory (skb_cow_data_for_xdp() -> skb_pp_cow_data() for generic
>> XDP, veth_convert_skb_to_xdp_buff() for veth), so its frags become
>> page_pool pages while the rxq keeps MEM_TYPE_PAGE_SHARED.
>>
>> We can't just fix rxq->mem.type in place:
>> - generic XDP: xdp->rxq is dev->_rx[queue].xdp_rxq (see
>> bpf_prog_run_generic_xdp()), a shared rxq that other CPUs may access in
>> parallel, so we must not write to it.
>> - veth: rq->xdp_rxq.mem is shared per-queue state that veth resets on XDP
>> teardown, and with GRO that reset runs without stopping in-flight NAPI,
>> so a type stashed there can be clobbered under a packet still in flight.
>>
>> Adding a check in __xdp_return() or bpf_xdp_shrink_data() itself is not an
>> option either: without recording it somewhere, both can only guess the
>> frag's memory type, which quickly gets confusing.
>>
>> So record it in the xdp_buff. Add a XDP_FLAGS_FRAGS_PAGE_POOL flag; the two
>> skb-cow sites set it, and bpf_xdp_shrink_data() frees the frag to the
>> page_pool when it is set, otherwise it keeps falling back to
>> xdp->rxq->mem.type unchanged. No other path changes behaviour.
>>
>> Fixes: e6d5dbdd20aa ("xdp: add multi-buff support for xdp running in generic mode")
>> Fixes: 0ebab78cbcbf ("net: veth: add page_pool for page recycling")
> Hi Jiayuan Chen,
>
> thx for fixing it. Can we do something like the patch below instead?
>
> Regards,
> Lorenzo
>
> diff --git a/net/core/xdp.c b/net/core/xdp.c
> index 1d679e8fd649..4ed659b58141 100644
> --- a/net/core/xdp.c
> +++ b/net/core/xdp.c
> @@ -433,16 +433,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xdp_rxq_info_attach_page_pool);
> void __xdp_return(netmem_ref netmem, enum xdp_mem_type mem_type,
> bool napi_direct, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> {
> + netmem_ref head_netmem = netmem_compound_head(netmem);
> + if (netmem_is_pp(head_netmem))
> + mem_type = MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL;
> +
> switch (mem_type) {
> case MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL:
> - netmem = netmem_compound_head(netmem);
> if (napi_direct && xdp_return_frame_no_direct())
> napi_direct = false;
> - /* No need to check netmem_is_pp() as mem->type knows this a
> - * page_pool page
> - */
> - page_pool_put_full_netmem(netmem_get_pp(netmem), netmem,
> - napi_direct);
> + page_pool_put_full_netmem(netmem_get_pp(head_netmem),
> + head_netmem, napi_direct);
> break;
> case MEM_TYPE_PAGE_SHARED:
> page_frag_free(__netmem_address(netmem));
Hi Lorenzo,
I tried this, but it regresses the bpf selftest with a page_pool ref
underflow (0 warns on master, 45 with the patch):
WARNING: include/net/page_pool/helpers.h:297 at
page_pool_alloc_frag_netmem
skb_pp_cow_data
veth_xdp_rcv_skb
On XDP_TX/XDP_REDIRECT veth has to take plain page refs via get_page()
(veth_xdp_get()) and then
consume_skb(): the skb itself must be freed while the data pages stay
alive for the frame. consume_skb()
already returns the skb's page_pool ref, so what the frame holds
afterwards is a plain page ref, to be
dropped with page_frag_free().
netmem_is_pp() can't see that: it only says the page still belongs to a
pool (other users may still hold pool refs on the same page),
not what kind of ref we're dropping. So __xdp_return() turns those
plain-ref drops into a second pool
put and pp_ref goes negative.
That's why I kept the type in the xdp_buff and only override it in the
shrink path, where we know the
frag ref is the cow'd page_pool one.
Regards,
Jiayuan