Re: [PATCH 2/2] ceph: use GFP_KERNEL consistently in __ceph_pool_perm_get()
Viacheslav Dubeyko <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:11:10 -0700
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.ceph-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2026-07-23 at 13:47 +0800, Xiubo Li via B4 Relay wrote: > From: Xiubo Li <[email protected]> > > __ceph_pool_perm_get() has four allocations for building OSD STAT > requests, three of which used GFP_NOFS and one (the page vector > allocation) used GFP_KERNEL, making them inconsistent. __ceph_pool_perm_get() has six allocation calls, not four: 2457: rd_req = ceph_osdc_alloc_request(..., GFP_NOFS); // (1) NOT touched by this patch 2471: err = ceph_osdc_alloc_messages(rd_req, GFP_NOFS); // (2) changed -> GFP_KERNEL 2475: wr_req = ceph_osdc_alloc_request(..., GFP_NOFS); // (3) changed -> GFP_KERNEL 2487: err = ceph_osdc_alloc_messages(wr_req, GFP_NOFS); // (4) changed -> GFP_KERNEL 2492: pages = ceph_alloc_page_vector(1, GFP_KERNEL); // (5) already GFP_KERNEL 2526: perm = kmalloc_flex(*perm, pool_ns, ..., GFP_NOFS); // (6) NOT touched by this patch Should we change other places too? Thanks, Slava. > > The function is only called from ceph_try_get_caps() and > __ceph_get_caps(), both of which are in the user I/O path (read, > write, fallocate, mmap fault), not in the writeback path. There is > no risk of recursive writeback, so GFP_NOFS is unnecessarily > restrictive. Use GFP_KERNEL consistently for all four allocations. > > Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <[email protected]> > --- > fs/ceph/addr.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c > index e2da3ab9f808..d2ac3df47e97 100644 > --- a/fs/ceph/addr.c > +++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c > @@ -2479,12 +2479,12 @@ static int __ceph_pool_perm_get(struct > ceph_inode_info *ci, > rd_req->r_base_oloc.pool_ns = > ceph_get_string(pool_ns); > ceph_oid_printf(&rd_req->r_base_oid, "%llx.00000000", ci- > >i_vino.ino); > > - err = ceph_osdc_alloc_messages(rd_req, GFP_NOFS); > + err = ceph_osdc_alloc_messages(rd_req, GFP_KERNEL); > if (err) > goto out_unlock; > > wr_req = ceph_osdc_alloc_request(&fsc->client->osdc, NULL, > - 1, false, GFP_NOFS); > + 1, false, GFP_KERNEL); > if (!wr_req) { > err = -ENOMEM; > goto out_unlock; > @@ -2495,7 +2495,7 @@ static int __ceph_pool_perm_get(struct > ceph_inode_info *ci, > ceph_oloc_copy(&wr_req->r_base_oloc, &rd_req->r_base_oloc); > ceph_oid_copy(&wr_req->r_base_oid, &rd_req->r_base_oid); > > - err = ceph_osdc_alloc_messages(wr_req, GFP_NOFS); > + err = ceph_osdc_alloc_messages(wr_req, GFP_KERNEL); > if (err) > goto out_unlock; >