Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests/cgroup: fix missing TAP output in test_hugetlb_memcg

Tao Cui <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.cgroups,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kvack.linux-mm
Message-ID <[email protected]>

在 2026/7/14 10:15, Song Hu 写道:
> main() in test_hugetlb_memcg never calls ksft_print_header(),
> ksft_set_plan(), or ksft_finished(), so its output has no TAP plan and is
> not valid TAP, unlike the sibling test_memcontrol and test_kmem tests.
> Add the header/plan/finished calls following the same pattern.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Song Hu <[email protected]>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_hugetlb_memcg.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_hugetlb_memcg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_hugetlb_memcg.c
> index b627d84358b1..8c5aced813b6 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_hugetlb_memcg.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_hugetlb_memcg.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,10 @@ static int test_hugetlb_memcg(char *root)
>  int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  {
>  	char root[PATH_MAX];
> -	int ret = EXIT_SUCCESS, has_memory_hugetlb_acc;
> +	int has_memory_hugetlb_acc;
> +
> +	ksft_print_header();
> +	ksft_set_plan(1);
>  
>  	has_memory_hugetlb_acc = proc_mount_contains("memory_hugetlb_accounting");
>  	if (has_memory_hugetlb_acc < 0)
> @@ -211,7 +214,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  	if (get_hugepage_size() != 2048) {
>  		ksft_print_msg("test_hugetlb_memcg requires 2MB hugepages\n");
>  		ksft_test_result_skip("test_hugetlb_memcg\n");
> -		return ret;
> +		ksft_finished();
>  	}
>  
>  	if (cg_find_unified_root(root, sizeof(root), NULL))
> @@ -233,10 +236,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  		ksft_test_result_skip("test_hugetlb_memcg\n");
>  		break;
>  	default:
> -		ret = EXIT_FAILURE;
>  		ksft_test_result_fail("test_hugetlb_memcg\n");
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	ksft_finished();
>  }

This one looks good to me — it mirrors the test_memcontrol/test_kmem
pattern and the exit-code semantics are preserved.

Reviewed-by: Tao Cui <[email protected]>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.