Re: [PATCH] blk-throttle: fix divide-by-zero on legacy iops limit of 0
Haris Iqbal <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.cgroups,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/14/26 12:35, Tao Cui wrote: > From: Tao Cui <[email protected]> > > Writing a multiple of 2^32 (e.g. 4294967296) to a legacy cgroup v1 > throttle iops file (blkio.throttle.{read,write}_iops_device) silently > truncates to 0: tg_set_conf() stores the sscanf-parsed u64 value into > an unsigned int field with no clamping. The cgroup v2 path, > tg_set_limit(), already clamps the same kind of value with > min_t(u64, val, UINT_MAX), but the legacy path never did. Note that > the "!v -> U64_MAX" mapping only catches an explicit zero and does not > catch a value that truncates to zero. > > With iops stored as 0, tg_update_has_rules() sets has_rules_iops[] and > the next IO reaches tg_within_iops_limit(), which computes > > jiffy_wait = max(jiffy_wait, HZ / iops_limit + 1); > > triggering a divide-by-zero oops. > > Fix it in two places: > > * tg_set_conf(): clamp the value to UINT_MAX, consistent with > tg_set_limit(). This closes the truncation root cause (and the > general silent truncation for any value above UINT_MAX). > > * tg_dispatch_iops_time(): treat iops_limit == 0 as unlimited so the > divide in tg_within_iops_limit() is never reached, defending > against any future path that could produce a zero limit. > Does this need a "Fixes:" tag. > Signed-off-by: Tao Cui <[email protected]> > --- > block/blk-throttle.c | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/blk-throttle.c b/block/blk-throttle.c > index ffc3b70065d4..3f3c1374f4b2 100644 > --- a/block/blk-throttle.c > +++ b/block/blk-throttle.c > @@ -883,7 +883,12 @@ static unsigned long tg_dispatch_iops_time(struct throtl_grp *tg, struct bio *bi > u32 iops_limit = tg_iops_limit(tg, rw); > unsigned long iops_wait; > > - if (iops_limit == UINT_MAX || tg->flags & THROTL_TG_CANCELING) > + /* > + * iops_limit == 0 is not a valid limit. Treat it as unlimited so we > + * never reach the HZ / iops_limit divide in tg_within_iops_limit(). > + */ > + if (iops_limit == UINT_MAX || iops_limit == 0 || > + tg->flags & THROTL_TG_CANCELING) > return 0; > > tg_update_slice(tg, rw); > @@ -1386,7 +1391,8 @@ static ssize_t tg_set_conf(struct kernfs_open_file *of, > if (is_u64) > *(u64 *)((void *)tg + of_cft(of)->private) = v; > else > - *(unsigned int *)((void *)tg + of_cft(of)->private) = v; > + *(unsigned int *)((void *)tg + of_cft(of)->private) = > + min_t(u64, v, UINT_MAX); > > tg_conf_updated(tg, false); > ret = 0;