Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: admin-guide: fix trailing whitespace in cgroup-v2.rst

Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.cgroups,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 7/18/26 9:56 AM, Yahya Toubali wrote:
> Remove trailing whitespace flagged by checkpatch.pl in the cgroup
> memory and writeback sections.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yahya Toubali <[email protected]>
> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> index 14b8c571c0d1..481658cfef40 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> @@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@ PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
>  	cgroup is within its effective low boundary, the cgroup's
>  	memory won't be reclaimed unless there is no reclaimable
>  	memory available in unprotected cgroups.
> -	Above the effective low	boundary (or 
> +	Above the effective low	boundary (or
>  	effective min boundary if it is higher), pages are reclaimed
>  	proportionally to the overage, reducing reclaim pressure for
>  	smaller overages.
> @@ -2194,7 +2194,7 @@ of the two is enforced.
>  
>  cgroup writeback requires explicit support from the underlying
>  filesystem.  Currently, cgroup writeback is implemented on ext2, ext4,
> -btrfs, f2fs, and xfs.  On other filesystems, all writeback IOs are 
> +btrfs, f2fs, and xfs.  On other filesystems, all writeback IOs are
>  attributed to the root cgroup.
>  
>  There are inherent differences in memory and writeback management
> 
> base-commit: 1229e2e57a5c2980ccd457b9b53ea0eed5a22ab3
> prerequisite-patch-id: c8aee5eb39e3cd6f2b2f28c82163565665288d2a

From Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst: (paraphrased)

Don't reply to v2 of a patch with v3 of that patch. We prefer that new/fresh
patches begin their own email thread.

thanks.
-- 
~Randy
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.