Re: [PATCH RFC 05/12] mm/slab: abstract slabobj_ext.objcg access
Omar Sandoval <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.cgroups,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <al598nIY_tliPubo@telecaster> |
On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 12:00:29PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote: > On 7/15/26 12:10, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote: > > In preparation for changes to the structure, abstract access to the > > objcg field with a slab_obj_ext_objcgp() function. > > Rename the field to _objcg to make an unexpected direct access a compile > > error. > > > > No functional change intended. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <[email protected]> > > Hm sashiko finds [1] that this is breaks tools/mm/show_page_info.py > > But I think it was already buggy. get_memcg_info() is supposed to return > memcg info for a page but in case of MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS there's no such info > for the whole page, there is only for individual slab objects and it doesn't > know which object so it effectively gets the first one. I think it should > just stop handling MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS, but that's a fix that should be sent > unrelated to this series. > > There's also tools/cgroup/memcg_slabinfo.py and that I think has been > already broken with memalloc profiling as it assuems slab.memcg_data is > still a raw struct obj_cgroup * and not struct slabobj_ext. > > I think it will be easier to fix it at once to handle the layout after this > series than trying to fix it first to handle the pre-series layout and then > update it with every relevant change. > > [1] > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=5 FWIW, if these scripts were in the drgn repo with test cases, these breakages would be caught by our CI and someone (usually me) would fix them up promptly :)