Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] mm/vmscan: avoid pointless large folio splits without swap
Barry Song <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.cgroups,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGsJ_4yj3dYah2exFWLMwFhUysOz2U9ANyoESgdGKvRL0E_0zw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 8:25 PM Xueyuan Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: "Barry Song (Xiaomi)" <[email protected]> > > When swap is disabled, exhausted, or unavailable due to memcg swap > limits, splitting a large anonymous folio cannot make swapout progress. > The fallback only destroys the large folio and inflates split statistics. > > Use -E2BIG from folio_alloc_swap() as the explicit signal that splitting > the folio might allow swapout of smaller pieces. For other allocation > failures, keep the existing activation path and avoid the split. > > This preserves the split fallback for fragmented or partially available > swap, while avoiding it when there is no backing space for any part of the > folio. > > Reported-by: Nanzhe Zhao <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <[email protected]> > --- > mm/vmscan.c | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > index bd1b1aa12581..40340a88f78e 100644 > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -1260,6 +1260,8 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, > */ > if (folio_test_anon(folio) && folio_test_swapbacked(folio) && > !folio_test_swapcache(folio)) { > + int ret; > + > if (!(sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_IO)) > goto keep_locked; > if (folio_maybe_dma_pinned(folio)) > @@ -1278,10 +1280,11 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, > split_folio_to_list(folio, folio_list)) > goto activate_locked; > } > - if (folio_alloc_swap(folio)) { > + ret = folio_alloc_swap(folio); > + if (ret) { > int __maybe_unused order = folio_order(folio); > > - if (!folio_test_large(folio)) > + if (!folio_test_large(folio) || ret != -E2BIG) I'd rather split it into two checks: if (!folio_test_large(folio)) goto activate_locked_split; if (ret != -E2BIG) goto activate_locked_split; This makes it clear that ret != -E2BIG is only relevant for the large folio case. > goto activate_locked_split; > /* Fallback to swap normal pages */ > if (split_folio_to_list(folio, folio_list)) > -- > 2.47.3 > Best Regards Barry