Re: [PATCH v3] blk-throttle: fix divide-by-zero on legacy iops limit of 0

Hi,

在 2026/7/21 12:08, Tao Cui 写道:
> From: Tao Cui <[email protected]>
>
> Writing a multiple of 2^32 (e.g. 4294967296) to a legacy cgroup v1
> throttle iops file (blkio.throttle.{read,write}_iops_device) silently
> truncates to 0: tg_set_conf() stores the sscanf-parsed u64 value into
> an unsigned int field with no clamping. The cgroup v2 path,
> tg_set_limit(), already clamps the same kind of value with
> min_t(u64, val, UINT_MAX), but the legacy path never did. Note that
> the "!v -> U64_MAX" mapping only catches an explicit zero and does not
> catch a value that truncates to zero.
>
> With iops stored as 0, tg_update_has_rules() sets has_rules_iops[] and
> the next IO reaches tg_within_iops_limit(), which computes
>
>      jiffy_wait = max(jiffy_wait, HZ / iops_limit + 1);
>
> triggering a divide-by-zero oops. The unclamped write in tg_set_conf()
> is long-standing, but it only became a crash once the HZ / iops_limit
> divide was added.
>
> Fix it in two places:
>
>    * tg_set_conf(): clamp the value to UINT_MAX, consistent with
>      tg_set_limit(). This closes the truncation root cause (and the
>      general silent truncation for any value above UINT_MAX).
>
>    * tg_dispatch_iops_time(): treat iops_limit == 0 as unlimited so the
>      divide in tg_within_iops_limit() is never reached, defending
>      against any future path that could produce a zero limit.
>
> Fixes: 1beabab88ece ("blk-throttle: fix lower control under super low iops limit")

I think the root cause is that iops_limit set to 0, and what's the behavior of throttle
with iops=0? Since calculate_io_allowed() will always return 0, it's likely that no IO
can be issued.

> Signed-off-by: Tao Cui <[email protected]>
>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Drop the (u64) cast on UINT_MAX: the kernel's type-checked min() accepts
>    two unsigned types of different width (both >= 4 bytes), so
>    min(v, UINT_MAX) compiles clean. (David Laight)
> - Add a Fixes: tag pointing at the commit that introduced the
>    HZ / iops_limit divide, which is also where the oops became reachable.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Use a "void *field" local for the config write so the assignment reads
>    *(u64 *)field / *(unsigned int *)field instead of the
>    (type *)((void *)tg + of_cft(of)->private) casts.
> - Use min(v, UINT_MAX) instead of min_t(u64, v, UINT_MAX).
> ---
>   block/blk-throttle.c | 13 ++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-throttle.c b/block/blk-throttle.c
> index ffc3b70065d4..e894852c3142 100644
> --- a/block/blk-throttle.c
> +++ b/block/blk-throttle.c
> @@ -883,7 +883,12 @@ static unsigned long tg_dispatch_iops_time(struct throtl_grp *tg, struct bio *bi
>   	u32 iops_limit = tg_iops_limit(tg, rw);
>   	unsigned long iops_wait;
>   
> -	if (iops_limit == UINT_MAX || tg->flags & THROTL_TG_CANCELING)
> +	/*
> +	 * iops_limit == 0 is not a valid limit. Treat it as unlimited so we
> +	 * never reach the HZ / iops_limit divide in tg_within_iops_limit().
> +	 */
> +	if (iops_limit == UINT_MAX || iops_limit == 0 ||
> +	    tg->flags & THROTL_TG_CANCELING)
>   		return 0;

Is the above still needed with the tg_set_conf() changes? 0 is not a valid limit, and
it should not exist in the first place, so I don't like the above new checking.

>   
>   	tg_update_slice(tg, rw);
> @@ -1383,10 +1388,12 @@ static ssize_t tg_set_conf(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>   	tg = blkg_to_tg(ctx.blkg);
>   	tg_update_carryover(tg);
>   
> +	void *field = (void *)tg + of_cft(of)->private;
> +
>   	if (is_u64)
> -		*(u64 *)((void *)tg + of_cft(of)->private) = v;
> +		*(u64 *)field = v;
>   	else
> -		*(unsigned int *)((void *)tg + of_cft(of)->private) = v;
> +		*(unsigned int *)field = min(v, UINT_MAX);
>   
>   	tg_conf_updated(tg, false);
>   	ret = 0;

-- 
Thanks,
Kuai