Re: [PATCH v2] fs: push nr_cached_objects memcg gating into individual filesystems
Usama Arif <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.cgroups,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 15 Jul 2026 03:35:16 -0700 Usama Arif <[email protected]> wrote: > Commit 0baad6f9b997 ("fs/super: skip non-memcg-aware nr_cached_objects > in memcg slab shrink") added a check in fs/super.c that skipped every > ->nr_cached_objects() hook whenever the shrinker was invoked for a > non-root memcg, on the assumption that none of them honour sc->memcg. > > That assumption is wrong for XFS, whose inode-reclaim hook is > intentionally driven from per-memcg contexts to free memcg-charged > slab. Encoding a blanket "never memcg-aware" policy in fs/super.c > short-circuits that path. > > Push the check down into the callbacks whose counters really are > irrelevant to per-memcg reclaim - btrfs_nr_cached_objects() and > shmem_unused_huge_count() - and drop the fs/super.c gate. Each > filesystem can now lift the restriction independently if its counter > later grows memcg awareness, without touching fs/super.c. > > Introduce mem_cgroup_shrink_is_root() in <linux/memcontrol.h> so the > callbacks don't open-code "sc->memcg is NULL or root". > > Fixes: 0baad6f9b997 ("fs/super: skip non-memcg-aware nr_cached_objects in memcg slab shrink") > Acked-by: Qi Zheng <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <[email protected]> > --- > v1 -> v2: > - Do not gate xfs_fs_nr_cached_objects(); XFS's inode reclaim is > intentionally driven from per-memcg contexts to free memcg-charged > slab (Dave Chinner). > - Add mem_cgroup_shrink_is_root() helper in <linux/memcontrol.h> so the > filesystem callbacks don't open-code "sc->memcg is NULL or root". > (Dave Chinner) > - Add fixes tag (Dave Chinner) > --- > fs/btrfs/super.c | 10 ++++++++++ > fs/super.c | 19 ++----------------- > include/linux/memcontrol.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > mm/shmem.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c > index a7d804219bec..cc4537435399 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ > #include <linux/namei.h> > #include <linux/miscdevice.h> > #include <linux/magic.h> > +#include <linux/memcontrol.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > #include <linux/ratelimit.h> > #include <linux/crc32c.h> > @@ -2434,6 +2435,15 @@ static long btrfs_nr_cached_objects(struct super_block *sb, struct shrink_contro > struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(sb); > const s64 nr = percpu_counter_read_positive(&fs_info->evictable_extent_maps); > > + /* > + * The evictable extent map counter is filesystem-global and does not > + * honour sc->memcg, so it is only meaningful on the global (kswapd or > + * root direct reclaim) shrink path. Skip the per-memcg iterations of > + * shrink_slab_memcg() to avoid queueing duplicate global work. > + */ > + if (!mem_cgroup_shrink_is_root(sc)) > + return 0; > + > trace_btrfs_extent_map_shrinker_count(fs_info, nr); > > return nr; > diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c > index d2d04a6f4f84..a8fd61136aaf 100644 > --- a/fs/super.c > +++ b/fs/super.c > @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ > #include <linux/export.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > #include <linux/blkdev.h> > -#include <linux/memcontrol.h> > #include <linux/mount.h> > #include <linux/security.h> > #include <linux/writeback.h> /* for the emergency remount stuff */ > @@ -170,19 +169,6 @@ static void super_wake(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int flag) > wake_up_var(&sb->s_flags); > } > > -/* > - * The s_op->nr_cached_objects hooks (used for example by btrfs and xfs) > - * operate on filesystem-global state and ignore sc->memcg. Driving them > - * from per-memcg shrink_slab_memcg() invocations only burns CPU walking > - * per-cpu counters and queueing duplicate work: the actual reclaim happens on > - * the global path (kswapd or root direct reclaim) regardless. Restrict them > - * to that path. > - */ > -static inline bool super_fs_objects_eligible(struct shrink_control *sc) > -{ > - return !sc->memcg || mem_cgroup_is_root(sc->memcg); > -} > - > /* > * One thing we have to be careful of with a per-sb shrinker is that we don't > * drop the last active reference to the superblock from within the shrinker. > @@ -212,7 +198,7 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, > if (!super_trylock_shared(sb)) > return SHRINK_STOP; > > - if (sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects && super_fs_objects_eligible(sc)) > + if (sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects) > fs_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb, sc); > > inodes = list_lru_shrink_count(&sb->s_inode_lru, sc); > @@ -273,8 +259,7 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_count(struct shrinker *shrink, > return 0; > smp_rmb(); > > - if (sb->s_op && sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects && > - super_fs_objects_eligible(sc)) > + if (sb->s_op && sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects) > total_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb, sc); > > total_objects += list_lru_shrink_count(&sb->s_dentry_lru, sc); Hi Christian, It looks like the changes in fs/super.c didnt make it into the patch that was merged in vfs.fixes [1]. Just wanted to check how we could correct this? Should Qi (or I) send a followup patch? Thanks, Usama [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git/commit/?h=vfs.fixes&id=0ef8faff490be6aa1a1e5dfcb0c8492689e91c0f