Re: [PATCH] mm: memcg: fix slab over-accounting for in-object objcg metadata
Tao Cui <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.cgroups,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
在 2026/8/12 20:48, Guopeng Zhang 写道: > From: Guopeng Zhang <[email protected]> > > obj_full_size() adds the size of an obj_cgroup pointer to s->size to > account for slabobj_ext storage, which normally resides outside the > object. > > Since commit a77d6d338685 ("mm/slab: place slabobj_ext metadata in > unused space within s->size"), slabobj_ext can reside in object padding > already covered by s->size. The extra charge then accounts for the same > memory twice. > > The per-slab obj_exts_in_object bit introduced by commit b5bc35ace2c5 > ("mm/slab: replace slab.stride with obj_exts_in_object") identifies this > layout. Use it to omit the extra charge only for in-object metadata. > Unlike in-object metadata, slab-leftover and separately allocated metadata > are not covered by the per-object s->size charge, so retain the existing > charge for those cases. > > Reported-by: Ran Xiaokai <[email protected]> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > Fixes: a77d6d338685 ("mm/slab: place slabobj_ext metadata in unused space within s->size") > Signed-off-by: Guopeng Zhang <[email protected]> > --- > mm/memcontrol.c | 14 ++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c > index d1312441a02b..aef480f46891 100644 > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > @@ -3526,12 +3526,16 @@ void obj_cgroup_uncharge(struct obj_cgroup *objcg, size_t size) > refill_obj_stock(objcg, size, true); > } > > -static inline size_t obj_full_size(struct kmem_cache *s) > +static inline size_t obj_full_size(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab) > { > /* > * For each accounted object there is an extra space which is used > - * to store obj_cgroup membership. Charge it too. > + * to store obj_cgroup membership. Charge it too, unless it is stored > + * in object padding already covered by s->size. > */ > + if (obj_exts_in_object(slab)) > + return s->size; > + > return s->size + sizeof(struct obj_cgroup *); > } > > @@ -3539,7 +3543,6 @@ bool __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru, > gfp_t flags, unsigned int slab_alloc_flags, > size_t size, void **p) > { > - size_t obj_size = obj_full_size(s); > struct obj_cgroup *objcg; > struct slab *slab; > size_t i; > @@ -3580,6 +3583,7 @@ bool __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru, > unsigned long obj_exts; > struct slabobj_ext *obj_ext; > struct obj_stock_pcp *stock; > + size_t obj_size; > > slab = virt_to_slab(p[i]); > > @@ -3590,6 +3594,8 @@ bool __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru, > continue; > } > > + obj_size = obj_full_size(s, slab); > + > /* > * if we fail and size is 1, memcg_alloc_abort_single() will > * just free the object, which is ok as we have not assigned > @@ -3632,7 +3638,7 @@ bool __memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct list_lru *lru, > void __memcg_slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab, > void **p, int objects, unsigned long obj_exts) > { > - size_t obj_size = obj_full_size(s); > + size_t obj_size = obj_full_size(s, slab); > > for (int i = 0; i < objects; i++) { > struct obj_cgroup *objcg; > > base-commit: e7f630142df2afccce90555e4972e60008222311 Reviewed-by: Tao Cui <[email protected]>