Re: [PATCH 2/9] memcg: remove v1 soft limit reclaim
Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.cgroups,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <an1_LgFQRT7oeskJ@tiehlicka> |
On Tue 11-08-26 13:31:56, Shakeel Butt wrote: > Nothing can put a cgroup on the soft limit rbtree anymore, so the tree > is always empty and both callers of memcg1_soft_limit_reclaim() are > guaranteed no-ops. Remove the reclaim pass from direct reclaim and from > kswapd, along with its implementation. > > In shrink_zones() this leaves the global reclaim branch with a > last_pgdat check that is now redundant with the identical check right > below it, so drop it and move the explaining comment down to the check > that remains. That check could only ever fire once last_pgdat was set, > which implies first_pgdat had already been assigned, so skipping it does > not change which node consider_reclaim_throttle() gets. > > Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <[email protected]> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Thanks! > --- > include/linux/memcontrol.h | 12 --- > mm/memcontrol-v1.c | 175 ------------------------------------- > mm/vmscan.c | 39 ++------- > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 220 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h > index e78bc98ab229..7b02f1b3bb88 100644 > --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h > +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h > @@ -1927,10 +1927,6 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_zswap_writeback_enabled(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > /* Cgroup v1-related declarations */ > > #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 > -unsigned long memcg1_soft_limit_reclaim(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, > - gfp_t gfp_mask, > - unsigned long *total_scanned); > - > bool mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize(bool wait); > > static inline bool task_in_memcg_oom(struct task_struct *p) > @@ -1951,14 +1947,6 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_exit_user_fault(void) > } > > #else /* CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 */ > -static inline > -unsigned long memcg1_soft_limit_reclaim(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, > - gfp_t gfp_mask, > - unsigned long *total_scanned) > -{ > - return 0; > -} > - > static inline bool task_in_memcg_oom(struct task_struct *p) > { > return false; > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c > index 05ef55cae4dc..b38b8d0f7f51 100644 > --- a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c > +++ b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c > @@ -34,13 +34,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup_tree { > > static struct mem_cgroup_tree soft_limit_tree __read_mostly; > > -/* > - * Maximum loops in mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim(), used for soft > - * limit reclaim to prevent infinite loops, if they ever occur. > - */ > -#define MEM_CGROUP_MAX_RECLAIM_LOOPS 100 > -#define MEM_CGROUP_MAX_SOFT_LIMIT_RECLAIM_LOOPS 2 > - > /* for OOM */ > struct mem_cgroup_eventfd_list { > struct list_head list; > @@ -233,174 +226,6 @@ void memcg1_remove_from_trees(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > } > } > > -static struct mem_cgroup_per_node * > -__mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node(struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node *mctz) > -{ > - struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz; > - > -retry: > - mz = NULL; > - if (!mctz->rb_rightmost) > - goto done; /* Nothing to reclaim from */ > - > - mz = rb_entry(mctz->rb_rightmost, > - struct mem_cgroup_per_node, tree_node); > - /* > - * Remove the node now but someone else can add it back, > - * we will to add it back at the end of reclaim to its correct > - * position in the tree. > - */ > - __mem_cgroup_remove_exceeded(mz, mctz); > - if (!soft_limit_excess(mz->memcg) || > - !css_tryget(&mz->memcg->css)) > - goto retry; > -done: > - return mz; > -} > - > -static struct mem_cgroup_per_node * > -mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node(struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node *mctz) > -{ > - struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz; > - > - spin_lock_irq(&mctz->lock); > - mz = __mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node(mctz); > - spin_unlock_irq(&mctz->lock); > - return mz; > -} > - > -static int mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg, > - pg_data_t *pgdat, > - gfp_t gfp_mask, > - unsigned long *total_scanned) > -{ > - struct mem_cgroup *victim = NULL; > - int total = 0; > - int loop = 0; > - unsigned long excess; > - unsigned long nr_scanned; > - struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie reclaim = { > - .pgdat = pgdat, > - }; > - > - excess = soft_limit_excess(root_memcg); > - > - while (1) { > - victim = mem_cgroup_iter(root_memcg, victim, &reclaim); > - if (!victim) { > - loop++; > - if (loop >= 2) { > - /* > - * If we have not been able to reclaim > - * anything, it might because there are > - * no reclaimable pages under this hierarchy > - */ > - if (!total) > - break; > - /* > - * We want to do more targeted reclaim. > - * excess >> 2 is not to excessive so as to > - * reclaim too much, nor too less that we keep > - * coming back to reclaim from this cgroup > - */ > - if (total >= (excess >> 2) || > - (loop > MEM_CGROUP_MAX_RECLAIM_LOOPS)) > - break; > - } > - continue; > - } > - total += mem_cgroup_shrink_node(victim, gfp_mask, false, > - pgdat, &nr_scanned); > - *total_scanned += nr_scanned; > - if (!soft_limit_excess(root_memcg)) > - break; > - } > - mem_cgroup_iter_break(root_memcg, victim); > - return total; > -} > - > -unsigned long memcg1_soft_limit_reclaim(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, > - gfp_t gfp_mask, > - unsigned long *total_scanned) > -{ > - unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0; > - struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz, *next_mz = NULL; > - unsigned long reclaimed; > - int loop = 0; > - struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node *mctz; > - unsigned long excess; > - > - if (lru_gen_enabled()) > - return 0; > - > - if (order > 0) > - return 0; > - > - mctz = soft_limit_tree.rb_tree_per_node[pgdat->node_id]; > - > - /* > - * Do not even bother to check the largest node if the root > - * is empty. Do it lockless to prevent lock bouncing. Races > - * are acceptable as soft limit is best effort anyway. > - */ > - if (!mctz || RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&mctz->rb_root)) > - return 0; > - > - /* > - * This loop can run a while, specially if mem_cgroup's continuously > - * keep exceeding their soft limit and putting the system under > - * pressure > - */ > - do { > - if (next_mz) > - mz = next_mz; > - else > - mz = mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node(mctz); > - if (!mz) > - break; > - > - reclaimed = mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim(mz->memcg, pgdat, > - gfp_mask, total_scanned); > - nr_reclaimed += reclaimed; > - spin_lock_irq(&mctz->lock); > - > - /* > - * If we failed to reclaim anything from this memory cgroup > - * it is time to move on to the next cgroup > - */ > - next_mz = NULL; > - if (!reclaimed) > - next_mz = __mem_cgroup_largest_soft_limit_node(mctz); > - > - excess = soft_limit_excess(mz->memcg); > - /* > - * One school of thought says that we should not add > - * back the node to the tree if reclaim returns 0. > - * But our reclaim could return 0, simply because due > - * to priority we are exposing a smaller subset of > - * memory to reclaim from. Consider this as a longer > - * term TODO. > - */ > - /* If excess == 0, no tree ops */ > - __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(mz, mctz, excess); > - spin_unlock_irq(&mctz->lock); > - css_put(&mz->memcg->css); > - loop++; > - /* > - * Could not reclaim anything and there are no more > - * mem cgroups to try or we seem to be looping without > - * reclaiming anything. > - */ > - if (!nr_reclaimed && > - (next_mz == NULL || > - loop > MEM_CGROUP_MAX_SOFT_LIMIT_RECLAIM_LOOPS)) > - break; > - } while (!nr_reclaimed); > - if (next_mz) > - css_put(&next_mz->memcg->css); > - return nr_reclaimed; > -} > - > static u64 mem_cgroup_move_charge_read(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, > struct cftype *cft) > { > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > index be6bd26e8c57..032b14793d91 100644 > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -6429,8 +6429,6 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc) > { > struct zoneref *z; > struct zone *zone; > - unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed; > - unsigned long nr_soft_scanned; > gfp_t orig_mask; > pg_data_t *last_pgdat = NULL; > pg_data_t *first_pgdat = NULL; > @@ -6472,35 +6470,17 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc) > sc->compaction_ready = true; > continue; > } > - > - /* > - * Shrink each node in the zonelist once. If the > - * zonelist is ordered by zone (not the default) then a > - * node may be shrunk multiple times but in that case > - * the user prefers lower zones being preserved. > - */ > - if (zone->zone_pgdat == last_pgdat) > - continue; > - > - /* > - * This steals pages from memory cgroups over softlimit > - * and returns the number of reclaimed pages and > - * scanned pages. This works for global memory pressure > - * and balancing, not for a memcg's limit. > - */ > - nr_soft_scanned = 0; > - nr_soft_reclaimed = memcg1_soft_limit_reclaim(zone->zone_pgdat, > - sc->order, sc->gfp_mask, > - &nr_soft_scanned); > - sc->nr_reclaimed += nr_soft_reclaimed; > - sc->nr_scanned += nr_soft_scanned; > - /* need some check for avoid more shrink_zone() */ > } > > if (!first_pgdat) > first_pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat; > > - /* See comment about same check for global reclaim above */ > + /* > + * Shrink each node in the zonelist once. If the zonelist is > + * ordered by zone (not the default) then a node may be shrunk > + * multiple times but in that case the user prefers lower zones > + * being preserved. > + */ > if (zone->zone_pgdat == last_pgdat) > continue; > last_pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat; > @@ -7161,8 +7141,6 @@ clear_reclaim_active(pg_data_t *pgdat, int highest_zoneidx) > static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int highest_zoneidx) > { > int i; > - unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed; > - unsigned long nr_soft_scanned; > unsigned long pflags; > unsigned long nr_boost_reclaim; > unsigned long zone_boosts[MAX_NR_ZONES] = { 0, }; > @@ -7268,12 +7246,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int highest_zoneidx) > */ > kswapd_age_node(pgdat, &sc); > > - /* Call soft limit reclaim before calling shrink_node. */ > sc.nr_scanned = 0; > - nr_soft_scanned = 0; > - nr_soft_reclaimed = memcg1_soft_limit_reclaim(pgdat, sc.order, > - sc.gfp_mask, &nr_soft_scanned); > - sc.nr_reclaimed += nr_soft_reclaimed; > > /* > * There should be no need to raise the scanning priority if > -- > 2.53.0-Meta -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs