Re: [syzbot] [block?] [cgroups?] possible deadlock in blkg_conf_prep
syzbot <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.cgroups,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on: HEAD commit: 818bebeb63dd drm/xe: Don't hand out the flat CCS storage a.. git tree: upstream console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=112c9e79580000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=ccca94d2c01b9e78 dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=144a1c0e22e53a08ef5a compiler: gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.44 syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=152c9e79580000 Downloadable assets: disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d900f083ada3/non_bootable_disk-818bebeb.raw.xz vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/6e4100526b12/vmlinux-818bebeb.xz kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/723c4783ee96/bzImage-818bebeb.xz IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit: Reported-by: [email protected] ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz.3.20/6039 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff8efc6c00 (fs_reclaim ){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:314 [inline] ){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4539 [inline] ){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4899 [inline] ){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x63/0x6a0 mm/slub.c:4933 but task is already holding lock: ffff888028bae100 (&q->blkcg_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: blkg_conf_prep+0xbc/0xf10 block/blk-cgroup.c:849 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&q->blkcg_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4} : lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5886 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1b9/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5843 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:646 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x1a4/0x1bc0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:821 blkcg_activate_policy+0x34f/0xbf0 block/blk-cgroup.c:1608 blk_throtl_init+0x39a/0x5b0 block/blk-throttle.c:1339 tg_set_conf.isra.0+0x252/0x500 block/blk-throttle.c:1368 cgroup_file_write+0x1e6/0x8a0 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4412 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3e0/0x5f0 fs/kernfs/file.c:345 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:595 [inline] vfs_write+0x6af/0x1050 fs/read_write.c:687 ksys_write+0x12a/0x250 fs/read_write.c:739 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x123/0x790 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #1 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#2){++++}-{0:0}: lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5886 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1b9/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5843 blk_alloc_queue+0x610/0x790 block/blk-core.c:504 __blk_alloc_disk+0xa0/0x170 block/genhd.c:1520 brd_alloc.isra.0+0x41a/0x820 drivers/block/brd.c:327 brd_init+0x167/0x190 drivers/block/brd.c:420 do_one_initcall+0x11c/0x6f0 init/main.c:1353 do_initcall_level init/main.c:1415 [inline] do_initcalls init/main.c:1431 [inline] do_basic_setup init/main.c:1451 [inline] kernel_init_freeable+0x6ea/0x7b0 init/main.c:1666 kernel_init+0x21/0x1e0 init/main.c:1556 ret_from_fork+0x730/0xd60 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245 -> #0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add+0xeb/0xe60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3181 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3300 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3924 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x1492/0x1ec0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5253 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5886 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1b9/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5843 __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:4375 [inline] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xc4/0x100 mm/page_alloc.c:4389 might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:314 [inline] slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4539 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4899 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x63/0x6a0 mm/slub.c:4933 __radix_tree_preload+0x333/0x820 lib/radix-tree.c:338 blkg_conf_prep+0x489/0xf10 block/blk-cgroup.c:885 tg_set_conf.isra.0+0x1ed/0x500 block/blk-throttle.c:1373 cgroup_file_write+0x1e6/0x8a0 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4412 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3e0/0x5f0 fs/kernfs/file.c:345 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:595 [inline] vfs_write+0x6af/0x1050 fs/read_write.c:687 ksys_write+0x12a/0x250 fs/read_write.c:739 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x123/0x790 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: fs_reclaim --> &q->q_usage_counter(io)#2 --> &q->blkcg_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&q->blkcg_mutex); lock(&q->q_usage_counter(io)#2); lock(&q->blkcg_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); *** DEADLOCK *** locks held by syz.3.20/6039: 6, last CPU#3: #0: ffff88802339cd30 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: fdget_pos+0x2aa/0x380 fs/file.c:1259 #1: ffff888037ab0460 (sb_writers#11){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x12a/0x250 fs/read_write.c:739 #2: ffff88802f2bbc80 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2c2/0x5f0 fs/kernfs/file.c:336 #3: ffff88802a08a5a8 (kn->active#66){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_get_active_of fs/kernfs/file.c:73 [inline] #3: ffff88802a08a5a8 (kn->active#66){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x332/0x5f0 fs/kernfs/file.c:337 #4: ffff888028badf80 (&q->rq_qos_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: blkg_conf_open_bdev+0x253/0x410 block/blk-cgroup.c:806 #5: ffff888028bae100 (&q->blkcg_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: blkg_conf_prep+0xbc/0xf10 block/blk-cgroup.c:849 stack backtrace: CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 6039 Comm: syz.3.20 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x100/0x190 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_circular_bug.cold+0x178/0x1be kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2059 check_noncircular+0x146/0x160 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2191 check_prev_add+0xeb/0xe60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3181 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3300 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3924 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x1492/0x1ec0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5253 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5886 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1b9/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5843 __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:4375 [inline] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xc4/0x100 mm/page_alloc.c:4389 might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:314 [inline] slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4539 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4899 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x63/0x6a0 mm/slub.c:4933 __radix_tree_preload+0x333/0x820 lib/radix-tree.c:338 blkg_conf_prep+0x489/0xf10 block/blk-cgroup.c:885 tg_set_conf.isra.0+0x1ed/0x500 block/blk-throttle.c:1373 cgroup_file_write+0x1e6/0x8a0 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4412 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3e0/0x5f0 fs/kernfs/file.c:345 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:595 [inline] vfs_write+0x6af/0x1050 fs/read_write.c:687 ksys_write+0x12a/0x250 fs/read_write.c:739 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:61 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x123/0x790 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:84 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f87a939e0d9 Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 e8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f87aa1ff028 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f87a9625fa0 RCX: 00007f87a939e0d9 RDX: 000000000000006a RSI: 00002000000000c0 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007f87a9435024 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007f87a9626038 R14: 00007f87a9625fa0 R15: 00007ffd6065d3e8 </TASK> --- If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with: #syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.