Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.cpufreq,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Monday, May 26, 2014 04:37:13 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26 May 2014 16:52, Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I agree as far as the 64-bit thing goes, but is switching to Hz really
> > necessary?
> 
> Don't really know that.. It seems that there will always be problems with
> close enough frequencies whenever rounding is done.

Well, rounding errors are a problem, but question is if that is enough of
a problem to justify expanding the storage size twice.  Also, that'd be
a performance hit on 32-bit systems.

> More can be elaborated by Soren.

OK

Rafael
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.