https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77201
--- Comment #36 from Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Srivatsa S. Bhat from comment #35)
> No, you misunderstood my intention. Of course your branch is a much
> stricter one with all new cpufreq commits reverted.
>
> I was just trying to point out commits which came after 3.13.8, in case even
> your branch (3.13.8 along with cpufreq reverts) ends up passing his tests.
> In that case we'll have to narrow down *within* the commits between v3.13.8
> and v3.14.1, no? My list was to help with that.
Ahh, sorry..
But in that case, wouldn't a git bisect between v3.13.8..my-branch would be
easier?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.