Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
Andrew Lunn <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:02:28 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.cpufreq,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm,org.kernel.vger.linux-samsung-soc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:19:54PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 23 July 2014 13:08, Lukasz Majewski <[email protected]> wrote: > > Do you want to say that we have enough tests and we don't need more ? > > No. We don't have any tests at all :) Not really true. I've found bugs triggering opps using cpufreq-bench. http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=138165517321579&w=2 and i hope you learned from that experience and run this tool when making changes to the core. There is an old writeup of cpufreq-bench here: https://lwn.net/Articles/339862/ and the code itself is in the mainline tree, tools/power/cpupower/bench Andrew