Re: Potential cpufreq backports for v3.10 LTS

Mark Brown <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:08:00 +0100
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.cpufreq,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:46:43AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:48:44PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > The power management team at Linaro has had a look at the cpufreq
> > updates since the v3.10 LTS and identified a few patches that look
> > like they should be in there.  The most recent of these is from v3.12 so
> > they won't apply to any of the more recent stable kernels.

> >  - 59a6342203a7a cpufreq: Fix governor start/stop race condition

> >    This looks like a straight race condition fix.

> That is not a commit id in Linus's tree :(

Interesting, I was able to cherry-pick it...  looks like the upstream
version is 95731eb.  In any case at roughly the same time you sent your
mail it's been drawn to my attention off-list that this was subsequently
reverted so please ignore this one.  The others should be fine though.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 473 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUNB3wAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQpeEH/2CC5NumQx2L8q9kWE8hFDDS
BwTK1aRGMeRB2bym8CifQ3kkynb3Sirj3ZaXd6dHduOAdlpK7NubeSFZlixXcNOs
Z/80bFiQJlWG9N8HbsYqD+mPzm9QY2zVr48wluQtql4oK3/qtW7qWTwTeOAUlHbL
P5TeFV9U0mMun+kTf7D67QUOjKOW9Ph5axLg9EFLjIKo1yQGMi85+cKG9Q2YOnrI
GaBEL4lJaQaATyCSgc0GVRgJ/n3g1Z4WpwdfUJqIiW1vU5LGfJEkfF2BbB7FO1v+
u1q/pwKDZf4e59O9RS8JARGh6mwrCouIugl2nsheZm/w+GF1BHCVzTuPrUTGObQ=
=0o9k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----