Re: Potential cpufreq backports for v3.10 LTS

Mark Brown <[email protected]> Wed, 8 Oct 2014 00:07:19 +0100

Newsgroups	org.kernel.vger.cpufreq,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:36:59AM +0300, Stratos Karafotis wrote:

> For your information, commits:

> - 61c63e5ed3b9 cpufreq: Remove unused APERF/MPERF support
> - cffe4e0e7413 cpufreq: Remove unused function __cpufreq_driver_getavg()

> remove unused code (no other functional changes) as a result of
> commit dfa5bb622555. They all were part of the same patch set.

> I'm not familiar with the procedure of patch inclusion in stable trees,
> so please forgive me if this mail is just noise.

If they're just cleanups and not producing a functional change then the
standard thing would be to leave them out of stable.

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 473 B)