Re: [PATCH] Generate signal names at runtime

Getting the names from libc sounds ideal, but i don't think there's any way
to do that with musl, which is what i'm trying to cross compile to. That's
why i attempted a more universal solution in my patch, but perhaps there
would be interest in musl to add sigabbrev_np instead.

As for a fallback, shouldn't the goal be something more similar to my
attempt rather than the existing code? Silently building a broken version
of dash when cross compiling isn't ideal.

Thanks
Henrik

On 2024-04-27 13:47, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Henrik Lindström <[email protected]> wrote:
>> They were previously generated at buildtime by mksignames.c, but that
>> approach had two flaws:
>> 1. The signal names were generated for the host system rather than the
>>   target system, resulting in broken cross-compiled builds.
>> 2. The SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX macros are usually implemented as
>>   function calls and can only be surely known at runtime.
>>
>> The new implementation has been tested to generate identical signal names
>> as before on these systems:
>> * Debian 12 (glibc, odd number of realtime signals)
>> * Alpine 3.18 (musl, even number of realtime signals)
>> * FreeBSD 14
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Henrik Lindström <[email protected]>
> 
> Now that glibc has sigabbrev_np we should switch to using that
> on Linux, perhaps with the existing code as a fallback.  BSD
> has always had ways of getting the signal name, though it may
> not be very portable so we'd need different flavours if people
> cared enough to add them.
> 
> Thanks,