Re: your $(#…) bugreport
mirabilos <[email protected]> Tue, 3 Feb 2026 14:32:59 +0100 (CET)
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.dash |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Jari, >Ouch, too bad POSIX didn't define them to be exact equivalents. the idea was, perhaps, that $(=E2=80=A6) was supposed to be an improvement over the previous accent-gravis-style which had known problems and incompatibilities. (Some of these are also documented in the GNU autoconf texinfo page, section Portable Shell, which I recommend, it=E2=80=99s a good read.) >From user's perspective, I wou=C3=B6d have expected the statements to >exhibit the same behavior. The difference here is: the accent-gravis style merely searches for the matching one, the POSIX style does a full recursive parsing to allow for parenthes=C4=93s to be not balanced inside, e.g. for case (except pdksh didn=E2=80=99t implement it like that, it was quite the journ= ey for mksh to get there). >Thanks for the explanation, You=E2=80=99re welcome, and thanks for caring about shells! bye, //mirabilos --=20 =E2=80=9ECool, /usr/share/doc/mksh/examples/uhr.gz ist ja ein Grund, mksh auf jedem System zu installieren.=E2=80=9C =09-- XTaran auf der OpenRheinRuhr, ganz begeistert (EN: =E2=80=9C[=E2=80=A6]uhr.gz is a reason to install mksh on every system= =2E=E2=80=9D)