Re: [PATCH] Use literal > and < characters

Sébastien Peterson-Boudreau <[email protected]> wrote:
> \*[...] is groff(1) specific syntax, whereas \*(XX is the standard
> troff(1) syntax.  Furthermore, groff_mdoc(1) lists the literal
> characters `>' and `<' as preferred over the Gt and Lt strings,
> which are only defined for compatibility with legacy documents.
> NetBSD also uses the literal characters for their sh(1) manual
> page (changed in commit 30b9dfc8813e15031a13fc2fc85094b81c71e2b7).
> ---
>> Everything looks good except that your emails has no Subject and
>> so it's been discarded by patchwork:
> Oops! Seems like I handled my gpg key fine, but goobered mail client config.
> Crossing my fingers this time...
> src/dash.1 | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

Patch applied.  Thanks.
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt