Re: [PATCH bpf-next 14/17] libbpf: Add support for SK_LOOKUP program type
Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.dccp,org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/8/20 10:41 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:58 AM Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Make libbpf aware of the newly added program type, and assign it a >> section name. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]> >> --- >> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 3 +++ >> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 2 ++ >> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 2 ++ >> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c | 1 + >> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c >> index 977add1b73e2..74f4a15dc19e 100644 >> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c >> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c >> @@ -6524,6 +6524,7 @@ BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(perf_event, BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT); >> BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(tracing, BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING); >> BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(struct_ops, BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS); >> BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(extension, BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT); >> +BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(sk_lookup, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP); >> >> enum bpf_attach_type >> bpf_program__get_expected_attach_type(struct bpf_program *prog) >> @@ -6684,6 +6685,8 @@ static const struct bpf_sec_def section_defs[] = { >> BPF_EAPROG_SEC("cgroup/setsockopt", BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCKOPT, >> BPF_CGROUP_SETSOCKOPT), >> BPF_PROG_SEC("struct_ops", BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS), >> + BPF_EAPROG_SEC("sk_lookup", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, >> + BPF_SK_LOOKUP), >> }; >> >> #undef BPF_PROG_SEC_IMPL >> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h >> index f1dacecb1619..8373fbacbba3 100644 >> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h >> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h >> @@ -337,6 +337,7 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_perf_event(struct bpf_program *prog); >> LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_tracing(struct bpf_program *prog); >> LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_struct_ops(struct bpf_program *prog); >> LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_extension(struct bpf_program *prog); >> +LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_sk_lookup(struct bpf_program *prog); >> >> LIBBPF_API enum bpf_prog_type bpf_program__get_type(struct bpf_program *prog); >> LIBBPF_API void bpf_program__set_type(struct bpf_program *prog, >> @@ -364,6 +365,7 @@ LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_perf_event(const struct bpf_program *prog); >> LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_tracing(const struct bpf_program *prog); >> LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_struct_ops(const struct bpf_program *prog); >> LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_extension(const struct bpf_program *prog); >> +LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_sk_lookup(const struct bpf_program *prog); > > cc Yonghong, bpf_iter programs should probably have similar > is_xxx/set_xxx functions?.. Not sure about this. bpf_iter programs have prog type TRACING which is covered by the above bpf_program__is_tracing. > >> >> /* >> * No need for __attribute__((packed)), all members of 'bpf_map_def' >> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map >> index e03bd4db827e..113ac0a669c2 100644 >> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map >> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map >> @@ -253,6 +253,8 @@ LIBBPF_0.0.8 { >> bpf_program__set_attach_target; >> bpf_program__set_lsm; >> bpf_set_link_xdp_fd_opts; >> + bpf_program__is_sk_lookup; >> + bpf_program__set_sk_lookup; >> } LIBBPF_0.0.7; >> > > 0.0.8 is sealed, please add them into 0.0.9 map below > >> LIBBPF_0.0.9 { >> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c >> index 2c92059c0c90..5c6d3e49f254 100644 >> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c >> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c >> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ probe_load(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type, const struct bpf_insn *insns, >> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS: >> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT: >> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM: >> + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP: >> default: >> break; >> } >> -- >> 2.25.3 >>