Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: ioctl: Use kernel memory on protocol ioctl callbacks

David Ahern <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.dccp,dev.linux.lists.mptcp,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-sctp,org.kernel.vger.linux-wpan,org.kernel.vger.netdev
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 5/25/23 9:05 AM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>> +/* A wrapper around sock ioctls, which copies the data from userspace
>> + * (depending on the protocol/ioctl), and copies back the result to userspace.
>> + * The main motivation for this function is to pass kernel memory to the
>> + * protocol ioctl callbacks, instead of userspace memory.
>> + */
>> +int sk_ioctl(struct sock *sk, unsigned int cmd, void __user *arg)
>> +{
>> +       int rc = 1;
>> +
>> +       if (ipmr_is_sk(sk))
>> +               rc = ipmr_sk_ioctl(sk, cmd, arg);
>> +       else if (ip6mr_is_sk(sk))
>> +               rc = ip6mr_sk_ioctl(sk, cmd, arg);
>> +       else if (phonet_is_sk(sk))
>> +               rc = phonet_sk_ioctl(sk, cmd, arg);
> 
> I don't understand what this buys us vs testing the sk_family,
> sk_protocol and cmd here.

To keep protocol specific code out of core files is the reason I
suggested it.

> 
> It introduces even deeper dependencies on the protocol specific
> header files. And the CONFIG issues that result from that. And it
> adds a bunch of wrappers that are only used once.
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.