Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] net: wire up support for file_operations->uring_cmd()

On 6/23/23 3:17 AM, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
> 
> I'd like to keep it passed to socket layer, so that sockets could
> implement some extra features in an async fashion.
> 
> What about having the function you posted below (and in v3)
> as a default implementation if proto_ops->uring_cmd is NULL?
> 

Nothing about this set needs uring_cmd added to proto ops. It adds uring
commands which are wrappers to networking APIs. Let's keep proper APIs
between subsystems.