Re: [PATCH v1 net 2/2] dccp/tcp: Call security_inet_conn_request() after setting IPv6 addresses.

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 5:20 PM Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Paul Moore <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 17:12:33 -0400
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 4:12 PM Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Initially, commit 4237c75c0a35 ("[MLSXFRM]: Auto-labeling of child
> > > sockets") introduced security_inet_conn_request() in some functions
> > > where reqsk is allocated.  The hook is added just after the allocation,
> > > so reqsk's IPv6 remote address was not initialised then.
> > >
> > > However, SELinux/Smack started to read it in netlbl_req_setattr()
> > > after commit e1adea927080 ("calipso: Allow request sockets to be
> > > relabelled by the lsm.").
> > >
> > > Commit 284904aa7946 ("lsm: Relocate the IPv4 security_inet_conn_request()
> > > hooks") fixed that kind of issue only in TCPv4 because IPv6 labeling was
> > > not supported at that time.  Finally, the same issue was introduced again
> > > in IPv6.
> > >
> > > Let's apply the same fix on DCCPv6 and TCPv6.
> > >
> > > Fixes: e1adea927080 ("calipso: Allow request sockets to be relabelled by the lsm.")
> > > Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > Cc: Huw Davies <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Paul Moore <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  net/dccp/ipv6.c       | 6 +++---
> > >  net/ipv6/syncookies.c | 7 ++++---
> > >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > Thanks for catching this and submitting a patch!
> >
> > It seems like we should also update dccp_v4_conn_request(), what do you think?
>
> Yes, and it's done in patch 1 as it had a separate Fixes tag.
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/

Great, thanks for doing that.  netdev folks, please feel free to add
my ACK to both patches in the patchset.

Acked-by: Paul Moore <[email protected]>

> It seems get_maintainers.pl suggested another email address of
> yours for patch 1.  It would be good to update .mailmap ;)

Yes, I really should, thanks for the reminder.  I'll send an update to
Linus once I get the merge window PRs sorted out.

-- 
paul-moore.com