Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] net: Remove the now superfluous sentinel elements from ctl_table array

Joel Granados <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:33:15 +0200
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.dccp,dev.linux.lists.bridge,dev.linux.lists.mptcp,org.kernel.vger.linux-hams,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-rdma,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-sctp,org.kernel.vger.linux-wpan,org.kernel.vger.linux-x25,org.kernel.vger.lvs-devel,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kernel.vger.netfilter-devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:53:47AM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> 2024-04-26, 12:46:53 +0200, Joel Granados via B4 Relay wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c b/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
> > index 6973dda3abda..a84690b13bb9 100644
> > --- a/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
> > +++ b/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
> [...]
> > @@ -723,12 +722,11 @@ static __net_init int sysctl_core_net_init(struct net *net)
> >  		if (tbl == NULL)
> >  			goto err_dup;
> >  
> > -		for (tmp = tbl; tmp->procname; tmp++)
> > -			tmp->data += (char *)net - (char *)&init_net;
> 
> Some coding style nits in case you re-post:
Thx. I will, so please scream if you see more issues.

> 
> > +		for (int i = 0; i < table_size; ++i)
> 
> move the declaration of int i out of the for (), it's almost never
> written this way (at least in networking)
done

> 
> > +			(tbl + i)->data += (char *)net - (char *)&init_net;
> 
>                         tbl[i].data = ...
> 
> is more in line with other similar functions in the rest of net/
done

> 
> 
> [...]
> > diff --git a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
> > index 6dab883a08dd..ecc849678e7b 100644
> > --- a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
> > +++ b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
> [...]
> > @@ -2674,6 +2673,7 @@ static const struct ctl_table mpls_table[] = {
> >  
> >  static int mpls_net_init(struct net *net)
> >  {
> > +	size_t table_size = ARRAY_SIZE(mpls_table);
> 
> This table still has a {} as its final element. It should be gone too?
Now, how did that get away?  I'll run my coccinelle scripts once more to
make sure that I don't have more of these hiding in the shadows.

Thx for your feedback

Best

-- 

Joel Granados
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 659 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=LvuX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----