Re: Device tree representation of (hotplug) connectors: discussion at ELCE
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Mon, 8 Sep 2025 11:01:42 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.devicetree-compiler,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMuHMdWmJcwy8YUqfeBT+B79a19YeW77Ms6KjNhKGY8935tTog@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi David, On Mon, 8 Sept 2025 at 06:36, David Gibson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 11:15:44AM +0530, Ayush Singh wrote: > > I would need to wrap my head around this a bit, specially in context of > > chaining connectors. It does seem like it will still require the points you > > mentioned above to be present in one form or another, i.e. some way to > > extend busses to different nodes/trees and connector (even a chained one) > > local symbols/aliases. > > Yes, it would still require those mappings. I don't think chained > connectors introduce a lot of extra complication. An intermediate > connector would need to be able to "re-export" things it got from its > parent connector to its child connector(s) - renaming them if > necessary. I don't expect chained connectors to be complicated. Boards using multiple-connectors may be more difficult, e.g. https://1bitsquared.de/products/pmod-hyperram Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected] In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds