Re: Phandles
Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:16:08 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.devicetree-compiler,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 13/04/2026 10:40, Kyle Bonnici wrote: > >> Please wrap your email responses to mailing list style. > > Hope I got this part right in this email! > >> To repeat my question: >> What does '1' stand for? > > ‘1' was just an random value to show the issue. Please note that > this issue has more context. This can all be found tin the Zephyr issue You cannot have random values. I quoted the DT spec. > https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/107066 > And also on the discord link. Well, we don't use discord but IRC... but that github issue also uses "pwms = <1 &pwm0 1 20 PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL>;" So again - what is "1"? I am asking because if you use incorrect value as phandle value, then DTC warning is obviously expected and nothing to fix here. > > To summarize, In zephyr the dts is pickled to a header file on > compile. Zephyr build system uses the bindings to determine types. > Any property with no type will not be pickled. I know, but this is not what you asked, right? You asked why phandle has to be the first entry in phandle-value type? I responded that DT spec makes it. Now to determine that DTC is correct or not correct, we need to understand what "1" means in this context - is it a valid phandle value? > > `/zephyr,user` node is a convenience node that does not need a binding > And types are inferred from values not property names. > > The reported issues: > - Zephyr is inferring a type but the DTC compiler is inferring another > type and reporting w waring about it in the build output Are you reporting bug in Zephyr or DTC? > - Zephyr does not infer types for properties with no bindings, hence > If any of mention properties are used and node has no binding for > that property name, zephyr will ignore this, but the DTC reports a > warning that contradics Zephyr's implementation. We discuss DTC here, yes? Whether it has or has not a bug? Please help me to understand the topic. Why would we care about Zephyr's implementation? It's Zephyr's problem and I am not a Zephyr developer. I am not saying that it is not important, just saying that I am not the audience to discuss it. Best regards, Krzysztof