Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] dt-bindings: wireless: bcm4329-fmac: Use wireless-controller.yaml schema

Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.devicetree-spec,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless,org.kernel.vger.netdev
Message-ID <CAL_JsqJHdw5XOz5PLUvTZLVA0mUQTyGuqnXT0WTLTqNh27VWAw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 1:39 PM Johannes Berg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 13:26 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > While it seems the reviews of the series caused more warnings for
> > Apple, in general, schemas creating warnings is not breaking things.
> > In a way, the whole point is to create warnings because if the .dts
> > files were perfect already we wouldn't need schemas. The main
> > requirement for schemas is only that they don't create warnings for
> > the examples. There's still too many for .dts files to worry about it
> > (and there's intermittent warnings from things getting merged via
> > different trees).
> >
>
> Oh, sure, but now if you want to apply the fixes you probably have to
> wait for the broken patches in my tree to percolate all the way through
> to Linus, then back to your tree, and then you can apply the fixes?

No, I never take .dts changes. They all go via the individual platform
trees. It's a bit weird if Krzysztof refers to the commit that's not
in the linear history, but that shouldn't hold things up. The issues
exist with or without the schema change. They might even be backported
to stable while the schema change won't be.

Rob
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.