Re: [PATCH v2] Add 'bootsource' /chosen property
Quentin Schulz <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Jun 2025 16:51:58 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.devicetree-spec |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Simon, On 6/10/25 4:26 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 09:34, Quentin Schulz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> From: Quentin Schulz <[email protected]> >> >> Bootloaders typically can be loaded from different storage media, such >> as eMMC, SD card, SPI flash, EEPROM, but also from non-persistent media >> such as USB (via proprietary protocols loading directly into SRAM, or >> fastboot, DFU, etc..), JTAG, ... >> >> This information is usually reported by the SoC-ROM via some proprietary >> mechanism (some specific address in registers/DRAM for example). >> >> It would be useful to know which medium was used to load the first stage >> of the bootloader. SoC-ROM shall be ignored and not reported in this >> property. >> >> This can allow client programs to detect which medium to write to when >> updating the boot program, or detect if fallback mechanisms to >> unexpected medium were used to reach the client program's execution. >> >> In cases where a boot program is split into multiple stages (like >> U-Boot), it only represents the device that was used to load the very >> first stage (in case of U-Boot, VPL/TPL/SPL whichever is executed first) >> and not any of the later stages (in case of U-Boot, TPL/SPL/proper) or >> any client program. They may match, but they may not and this property >> is meant to only represent the device used for loading the very first >> stage. >> >> I have a board running U-Boot which currently has 9 boot scenarios >> (eMMC/SD/SPI-NOR for the first stage, eMMC/SD/SPI-NOR for the next >> stages; not counting USB loading yet, which would make it a few more). I >> cannot force the BootROM of this board to select a specific device aside >> from erasing the other media. >> The only way to identify which device was used for the first stage is to >> parse U-Boot first stage console output or add some custom logic for my >> board. To validate that a new version of the bootloader works, including >> the fallback mechanisms, I need to make sure the BootROM loads the first >> stage from the expected device otherwise I may have false positives. >> This would be useful for automated testing. >> >> I could also very well see this being used to identify where the first >> stage of the boot program is stored (which may differ from where the >> later stages are! that's the case for U-Boot proper for example!) to be >> able to update it from a client program. >> >> Note that Barebox has been using this property for a while already, with >> this very content[1]. >> >> This is chosen as a string so that it matches other properties in >> /chosen (e.g. stdout-path) as well as allows for extending it, in case >> one needs to provide additional information (e.g. HW boot partition for >> eMMC, a specific disk on an AHCI controller, a specific USB device on >> a USB bus, etc.). >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/[email protected]/ >> >> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <[email protected]> >> --- >> Note that this property is already set by Barebox and I'm planning on >> adding it to U-Boot as well, specifically for Rockchip SoCs. >> >> I have some doubts about the wording, especially in the case of >> hypervisors or chained boot programs. I'm not entirely sure what would >> make the most sense to put in the property for those scenario. >> --- >> Changes in v2: >> - added usecases, non-usecases and increased verbosity of the definition >> of the property name as requested by Simon, >> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] >> --- >> source/chapter3-devicenodes.rst | 17 +++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) >> > > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]> > > Does this need to go into the schema as well? > Considering this should ever only be programmatically set at runtime, I'm not sure this is necessary? But taking into account that u-boot,version is part of the schema, I guess this could too :) Cheers, Quentin