Re: [PATCH v2] docs: devicetree: overlay-notes: recommend top-level compatible in DTSO
David Gibson <[email protected]> Thu, 4 Sep 2025 12:58:42 +1000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.devicetree-spec,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aLkAYitpWxWx131p@zatzit> |
On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 10:43:50AM -0700, Raymond Mao wrote: > When managing multiple base device trees and overlays in a structured > way (e.g. bundled in firmware or tools), it is helpful to identify the > intended target base DT for each overlay, which can be done via a > top-level compatible string in the overlay. > > This provides a way to identify which overlays should be applied once the > DT is selected for the case when a device have a common firmware binary > which only differs on the DT and overlays. > > This patch updates the document with a note and example for this > practice. > For more information on this firmware requirement, please see [1]. > > [1] https://github.com/FirmwareHandoff/firmware_handoff/pull/74 I think this idea is probably useful enough to be a good idea anyway. However, note that it leans in to an existing ugliness of the overlay format: Overlay dtbs kind of mix "in band" information - the actual new content for the tree - with "out of band" information - how to apply the overlay itself. Whether a given property is data or metadata is determined by it's place in the tree in a moderately complex and not super obvious way. About the clearest divide that exists is that generally the root and first-level subnodes are information only for overlay application, everything under that is data to be applied to the tree. This all tends to have names that would be unlikely (though not strictly impossible) in a fully applied tree. Putting 'compatible' at the root of the overlay is putting something that looks very much like a regular device tree property in a place and with a function that's purely about applying / validating the overlay itself. > Suggested-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Raymond Mao <[email protected]> > --- > Changes in v2: > - Updated commit message. > > Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.rst | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.rst b/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.rst > index 35e79242af9a..30b142d1b2ee 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.rst > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.rst > @@ -103,6 +103,34 @@ The above bar.dtso example modified to use target path syntax is:: > ---- bar.dtso -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > +Overlay identification > +---------------------- > + > +When managing overlays dynamically or bundling multiple base device trees > +and overlays in a single system (e.g., in firmware, initramfs, or user-space > +tools), it becomes important to associate each overlay with its intended > +target base DT. > + > +To support this, overlays should include the top-level compatible string > +from its base DT. > +This enables higher-level software or firmware to identify which base DT > +an overlay is compatible with and apply it accordingly. > + > +Example usage:: > + > + ---- bar.dtso - overlay with top-level compatible string ------------------- > + /dts-v1/; > + /plugin/; > + compatible = "corp,foo"; This is not valid dts syntax. Properties must be within a node. > + > + ... > + ---- bar.dtso -------------------------------------------------------------- > + > +This top-level compatible string is not required by the kernel overlay > +mechanism itself, but it is strongly recommended for managing overlays in > +scalable systems. > + > + > Overlay in-kernel API > -------------------------------- > > -- > 2.25.1 > > -- David Gibson (he or they) | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you, not the other way | around. http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEO+dNsU4E3yXUXRK2zQJF27ox2GcFAmi5AGEACgkQzQJF27ox 2GeGuw/9GFIC/VwZAiCLKeFz4rMslFWYRnN5uQDhDzU6gFaRVJZgr2m1P7poSWFX 91KtHcnUfiXc2dFE6ndfBrPnudTyPdMujkVEpKuM/KNGpLoDBDLni0tSIZKJIohs FW8t4tBVFx+nm8CDjXr/KJWXip4Q79ypUWRlMpUgM50WyYlrVD6nHkzfse/jeRWE dM0aMFvP9labF9BMWBgM6bSfQRIWQA2TtWEIIkl48vx7G5hOxN3pN65B3XXNZKVJ Kq8RPizP2amltzd5h+duL/HnWFxWw+2wdKwqRomw24JHlnvUnPLUMO3TP0hsYr+W 0212oiD+XQqLku3yrG/QAodOyOH53w7VauhfhbdTvYJ4qa5xDe866x7TW/408jw0 14sUEKGpDQJvC1cQ89O0KEnvdXar444abNDGB5b4HlJsLVbnDKN/k/OieutTUGI/ fCKk7umFVsgS9VrebgO+FdTO6s+x+X0T+O0/TS2WeRJu+P589c0UL4kYT97jTNFW nkUX3wvs262xinsInPjneBSYvwVIR2YEnfpbRyGOeDowb7YTSpVxcnCDfp6y3Ksf e1RqZnuu3/vrrfFWPXxDTjb7nTBSaIGdmSwHO8fwouW0cQe/S4nylIYHsG2NUIsr g1r19xbeeos3uhwNA8mFQjNS7CLvxsjVE8/Jx8qoasg6O+z0TxY= =Y1Ke -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----