Re: SoC-specific device tree aliases?
Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]> Wed, 3 Dec 2025 12:20:52 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.devicetree-spec,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 03.12.2025 11:25:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 03/12/2025 11:16, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > > Hello Krzysztof, > > > > On 11/17/25 5:29 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 17/11/2025 17:06, Rob Herring wrote: > >>>> So you want it to be an ABI for barebox, sure, just make it a binding. > >>> > >>> What do you have in mind? Other than standard names for the aliases, > >>> what can we check here? That a specific alias points to a specific > >>> path? That would be a bit too much IMO. That would be equivalent to > >>> specifying possible values in 'reg' for all devices. > >> > >> Binding with pattern or list of needed alias names, referenced by given > >> soc-platform top-level schema. > >> > >> One of the points is to make it explicit and obvious (e.g. to Arnd or to > >> me if I forget, because I follow the same logic of aliases per board) > >> that these aliases are used outside of kernel. > >> > >> Just because ufs/mmc/spi can be used that way, does not mean we should > >> accept any possible alias into soc.dtsi. > > > > I can't see how this could work. A number of boards renumber MMC devices > > in a different manner than the SoC reference manual: > > > > - Changing the alias numbering is an ABI break, because Linux derives > > its /dev/mmcblkX numbering from it > > First, why the alias would change? Isn't the board following the SoC > numbering in 99.9% cases? > > Second, I don't think it is an ABI. We had it ~5 or ~8 years ago where > the mmcblkX was changing based on probe ordering. Many people setups got > broken, many people complained and the consensus reply was: please start > finally using UUID/PARTUIID/LABEL for rootfs. Eventually we got back to > mmcblkX stability but rule is there - if your cmdline has /dev/mmcblkX, > then it is your problem. In order to use UUID/PARTUIID/LABEL in the kernel command line, the firmware/bootloader/... has to map from the register value to the instance to read the UUID/PARTUIID/LABEL from the media. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEn/sM2K9nqF/8FWzzDHRl3/mQkZwFAmkwHREACgkQDHRl3/mQ kZzwfgf8D0iKkrtKkeJ70sXp75h6AxSyZRncrmiVeBUi8lAVt62FfYa5J61M91Ml 6x5nXN82mwu8dpL/FaF0M1bU4gf2lwv1RBkr2AV3N6ujlWfZlNKyghtiZPcTcTeH PUy41AeTORxsm8AcdoFWMaG4HD/ghoK69Lmjr4R6a8aQwMEg06v4dsKoq0oFe6af JSVNLeyF1BAkNGywXpvBLNn0Vbn6MWymnJh/f3/e2Y1fKKI0uRf9VVuGPOfjZCFS +a0Yw1DfKGuxexmfsh/v7NpdUSK72rOSmaLN85uJ+9TYZrMWyB+OSTV4DFXY1pGS 6fhmRNBMCR420AxfBHuuecVCOVR+DA== =Pc8g -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----