Re: [RFC PATCH 05/77] fdtdump: Change FDT_PROP prob handling to ease future addition
Ayush Singh <[email protected]> Mon, 12 Jan 2026 21:11:52 +0530
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.devicetree-spec,org.kernel.vger.devicetree-compiler,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/12/26 7:48 PM, Herve Codina wrote: > In order to ease future tags addition, perform operation related to > FDT_PROP when the tag is explicitly FDT_PROP instead of relying to a > kind of default value case. > > Handle the FDT_PROP tag exactly in the same way as it is done for > other tags. > > No functional modification. > > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <[email protected]> > --- > fdtdump.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fdtdump.c b/fdtdump.c > index ec25edf..95a2274 100644 > --- a/fdtdump.c > +++ b/fdtdump.c > @@ -129,23 +129,25 @@ static void dump_blob(void *blob, bool debug) > continue; > } > > - if (tag != FDT_PROP) { > - fprintf(stderr, "%*s ** Unknown tag 0x%08"PRIx32"\n", depth * shift, "", tag); > - break; > + if (tag == FDT_PROP) { > + sz = fdt32_to_cpu(GET_CELL(p)); > + s = p_strings + fdt32_to_cpu(GET_CELL(p)); > + if (version < 16 && sz >= 8) > + p = PALIGN(p, 8); > + t = p; > + > + p = PALIGN(p + sz, 4); > + > + dumpf("%04"PRIxPTR": string: %s\n", (uintptr_t)s - blob_off, s); > + dumpf("%04"PRIxPTR": value\n", (uintptr_t)t - blob_off); > + printf("%*s%s", depth * shift, "", s); > + utilfdt_print_data(t, sz); > + printf(";\n"); > + continue; > } > - sz = fdt32_to_cpu(GET_CELL(p)); > - s = p_strings + fdt32_to_cpu(GET_CELL(p)); > - if (version < 16 && sz >= 8) > - p = PALIGN(p, 8); > - t = p; > - > - p = PALIGN(p + sz, 4); > - > - dumpf("%04"PRIxPTR": string: %s\n", (uintptr_t)s - blob_off, s); > - dumpf("%04"PRIxPTR": value\n", (uintptr_t)t - blob_off); > - printf("%*s%s", depth * shift, "", s); > - utilfdt_print_data(t, sz); > - printf(";\n"); > + > + fprintf(stderr, "%*s ** Unknown tag 0x%08"PRIx32"\n", depth * shift, "", tag); > + break; > } > } > This seems reasonable refactor independently from the rest of the patch series. Reviewed-by: Ayush Singh <[email protected]>