Re: [RFC PATCH 02/15] fdtdump: Remove dtb version check

--BeDI6Qa22isVpmj7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 06:33:30PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> fdtdump checks the dtb version and simply failed if the dtb version is
> newer than the last version supported by fdtdump.
>=20
> This check is not needed and too restrictive. Indeed, fdtdump does
> read-only operations on the dtb provided and should rely only the
> last_comp_version header field to know whether or not it can read the
> dtb.
>=20
> The current check also avoid the use of fdtdump in tests checking for
> the libfdt behavior when an new (future) dtb version is used.
>=20
> Relax fdtdump checks removing the check of the dtb version header field.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <[email protected]>

Applied, thanks.

--=20
David Gibson (he or they)	| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you, not the other way
				| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

--BeDI6Qa22isVpmj7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Jnv2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--BeDI6Qa22isVpmj7--