Re: [PATCH v2 05/19] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add LL interrupt placement policy

On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 05:41:36PM +0900, Koichiro Den wrote:
> Move linked-list interrupt placement behind a core callback so eDMA and
> HDMA can use different policies.
>
> Keep the eDMA behavior. For HDMA, place watermarks at descriptor ends,
> before link entries, and every four entries when a descriptor exceeds the
> usable ring capacity or another issued descriptor follows. A later patch
> handles these watermarks as progress events.
>
> Four entries is an empirically chosen coalescing interval.
>
> Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>   - Fix the zero-based interval so the first watermark is on the fourth
>     entry, not the fifth.
>   - Revise the commit message and source comments.
>
>  drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c    |  8 +++++++-
>  drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h    |  2 ++
>  drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> index a9f25a65294e..78d1bb6302fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,12 @@ static u32 dw_edma_core_get_free_num(struct dw_edma_chan *chan)
>  		chan->ll_max;
>  }
>
> +static bool dw_edma_core_enable_ll_irq(struct dw_edma_desc *desc, u32 i,
> +				       u32 free)
> +{
> +	return desc->chan->dw->core->ll_irq(desc, i, free);
> +}
> +
>  static void dw_edma_core_ll_start(struct dw_edma_desc *desc)
>  {
>  	struct dw_edma_chan *chan = desc->chan;
> @@ -120,7 +126,7 @@ static void dw_edma_core_ll_start(struct dw_edma_desc *desc)
>
>  		dw_edma_core_ll_data(chan, &desc->burst[i],
>  				     chan->ll_head, chan->cb,
> -				     i == desc->nburst - 1 || free == 1);
> +				     dw_edma_core_enable_ll_irq(desc, i, free));
>
>  		chan->ll_head++;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
> index f2c2d5af1fff..8ed37e8a12cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
> @@ -162,6 +162,8 @@ struct dw_edma_core_ops {
>  	void (*ll_link)(struct dw_edma_chan *chan, u32 idx, bool cb, u64 addr);
>  	void (*ll_clear)(struct dw_edma_chan *chan, u32 idx);
>  	int (*ll_cur_idx)(struct dw_edma_chan *chan);
> +	/* Called with chan->vc.lock held. */
> +	bool (*ll_irq)(struct dw_edma_desc *desc, u32 i, u32 free);
>  	void (*ch_doorbell)(struct dw_edma_chan *chan);
>  	void (*ch_enable)(struct dw_edma_chan *chan);
>  	void (*ch_config)(struct dw_edma_chan *chan);
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
> index c31fff095b4f..62141aa32e50 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
> @@ -649,6 +649,15 @@ static int dw_edma_v0_core_ll_cur_idx(struct dw_edma_chan *chan)
>  	return (val - base) / EDMA_LL_SZ;
>  }
>
> +static bool dw_edma_v0_core_ll_irq(struct dw_edma_desc *desc, u32 i, u32 free)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * eDMA reports LL interrupts through DONE. Keep them at
> +	 * descriptor ends, plus the last free slot to refill the ring.
> +	 */
> +	return i == desc->nburst - 1 || free == 1;
> +}
> +
>  /* eDMA debugfs callbacks */
>  static void dw_edma_v0_core_debugfs_on(struct dw_edma *dw)
>  {
> @@ -685,6 +694,7 @@ static const struct dw_edma_core_ops dw_edma_v0_core = {
>  	.ll_link = dw_edma_v0_core_ll_link,
>  	.ll_clear = dw_edma_v0_core_ll_clear,
>  	.ll_cur_idx = dw_edma_v0_core_ll_cur_idx,
> +	.ll_irq = dw_edma_v0_core_ll_irq,
>  	.ch_doorbell = dw_edma_v0_core_ch_doorbell,
>  	.ch_enable = dw_edma_v0_core_ch_enable,
>  	.ch_config = dw_edma_v0_core_ch_config,
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
> index b2d35f0b7b6d..fb651a83f0f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
>  #include "dw-hdma-v0-regs.h"
>  #include "dw-hdma-v0-debugfs.h"
>
> +/* Empirically chosen watermark interval. */
> +#define HDMA_V0_WATERMARK_INTERVAL			4
> +
>  enum dw_hdma_control {
>  	DW_HDMA_V0_CB					= BIT(0),
>  	DW_HDMA_V0_TCB					= BIT(1),
> @@ -417,6 +420,30 @@ static int dw_hdma_v0_core_ll_cur_idx(struct dw_edma_chan *chan)
>  	return (val - base) / EDMA_LL_SZ;
>  }
>
> +static bool dw_hdma_v0_core_ll_irq(struct dw_edma_desc *desc, u32 i, u32 free)
> +{
> +	struct dw_edma_chan *chan = desc->chan;
> +	bool needs_progress;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Always place a watermark at a descriptor end and before the link
> +	 * element. The first reports descriptor progress; the second provides
> +	 * one progress point per ring lap.
> +	 */
> +	if (i == desc->nburst - 1 || chan->ll_head == chan->ll_max - 1)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Use periodic watermarks when a descriptor exceeds the usable ring or
> +	 * when more issued work follows it.
> +	 */
> +	needs_progress = desc->nburst > chan->ll_max - 1 ||
> +			 !list_is_last(&desc->vd.node, &chan->vc.desc_issued);
> +
> +	return needs_progress &&
> +	       (chan->ll_head + 1) % HDMA_V0_WATERMARK_INTERVAL == 0;

This is not good layer design. edma/hdma supposed just do action to operate
register, less software logic.

Can we move this code to core layer?  introduce an 'interval' for difference
backend.

eDMA: interval is number description.
hDMA: interval is HDMA_V0_WATERMARK_INTERVAL

So core layer can use unified logic to handle for both eDMA and hDMA?

Frank

> +}
> +
>  /* HDMA debugfs callbacks */
>  static void dw_hdma_v0_core_debugfs_on(struct dw_edma *dw)
>  {
> @@ -441,6 +468,7 @@ static const struct dw_edma_core_ops dw_hdma_v0_core = {
>  	.ll_link = dw_hdma_v0_core_ll_link,
>  	.ll_clear = dw_hdma_v0_core_ll_clear,
>  	.ll_cur_idx = dw_hdma_v0_core_ll_cur_idx,
> +	.ll_irq = dw_hdma_v0_core_ll_irq,
>  	.ch_doorbell = dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_doorbell,
>  	.ch_enable = dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_enable,
>  	.ch_config = dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_config,
> --
> 2.51.0
>