Re: [PATCH v2 dwarves 4/5] man-pages: document true_signature btf_feature
Matt Bobrowski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.dwarves,org.kernel.vger.bpf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 05:26:49PM +0000, Alan Maguire wrote: > Ensure non-default "true_signature" feature is documented in > the manual page. > > Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <[email protected]> Acked-by: Matt Bobrowski <[email protected]> > --- > man-pages/pahole.1 | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/man-pages/pahole.1 b/man-pages/pahole.1 > index 3125de3..90a8f45 100644 > --- a/man-pages/pahole.1 > +++ b/man-pages/pahole.1 > @@ -337,6 +337,11 @@ Supported non-standard features (not enabled for 'default') > of split BTF with a possibly changed base, storing > it in a .BTF.base ELF section. > global_var Encode all global variables using BTF_KIND_VAR in BTF. > + true_signature Encode functions ensuring that binary-level > + (rather than source-level) signatures are used; ^ within the generated BTF. > + for gcc these are ".isra.0" and ".costprop.0" > + optimized functions For BTF generation, would there ever be a situation whereby we wouldn't want true signature support? I'm just trying to understand why this isn't defaulted to true.