Re: ecryptfs is unmaintained and untested
"Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.ecryptfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 11:07:56PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > Yeah. Sadly I'm one, as I needed something to migrate off of when > encfs was deprecated. > > Is there another soon-to-be-deprecated filesystem to encrypt > directories I should move to? :) Well, the closest way of encrypting directories is fscrypt. The good news is that it works on top of btrfs, ext4, f2fs, and ubifs, and it's not likely to be deprecated given that it is used by chromeos and android. The bad news is that the integration with traditional Linux desktop setups (e.g., login, etc.) was never completed. This is probably because for many desktop and server configurations, using dm-crypt is actually better suited and more secure. It certainly doesn't solve the "just encrypt a directory hierarchy in a file system" and the "support multiple users' who might have different encryption keys and which are mutually suspicious" use cases. But this appears to not be sufficiently interesting for distributions to do that integration work. - Ted