Re: [PATCH] fuse: fix conversion of fuse_reverse_inval_entry() to start_removing()

Al Viro <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.ecryptfs,dev.linux.lists.netfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-cifs,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-nfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-security-module,org.kernel.vger.linux-unionfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs,org.kernel.vger.selinux
Message-ID <20251201083324.GA3538@ZenIV> 
On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 09:22:54AM +0100, Amir Goldstein wrote:

> I don't think there is a point in optimizing parallel dir operations
> with FUSE server cache invalidation, but maybe I am missing
> something.

The interesting part is the expected semantics of operation;
d_invalidate() side definitely doesn't need any of that cruft,
but I would really like to understand what that function
is supposed to do.

Miklos, could you post a brain dump on that?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.