Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce the end_syncfs option
Vincent Fu <[email protected]> Mon, 26 Jan 2026 21:15:57 -0500
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.fio |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOp=CXnJ3Sr2ZGDjiAHdPhi4eKfUo-RtJ0h1oF072ew+Xfcy7Q@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 9:05 PM Damien Le Moal <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 1/27/26 10:01, Vincent Fu wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 1:22 AM Damien Le Moal <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > <snip> > >> } > >> + > >> + if (td->o.end_syncfs) { > >> + td_set_runstate(td, TD_FSYNCING); > >> + > >> + for_each_file(td, f, i) { > >> + if (fio_file_syncfs(td, f)) > >> + log_err("fio: end_syncfs failed\n"); > >> + break; > > > > This seems like it will break out of the loop after syncfs-ing the first file. > > Is this intentional or should fio break only if there is an error? > > It is intentional and it is the entire point of this patch: doing syncfs for the > first file will sync the entire FS, so all the other files will be sync-ed as > well. We thus avoid the entire loop on all files which is extremely slow when > running with a large number of files. We only need to do syncfs() once for the > first file. Ideally, we should do it for the directory specified for the files, > but that is a little more involved as a change. Ok thank you for clarifying. Please emphasize in the documentation that this feature assumes that all files will reside on the same file system. Vincent