Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: inline enable_quota helper in test 301

Zorro Lang <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.fstests,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs
Message-ID <agU-k5OnlkvcLiFB@zlang-mailbox>
On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 05:43:33PM -0700, Boris Burkov wrote:
> The enable_quota helper in btrfs/301 takes a mode argument ('n', 's',
> or anything else) to switch between "no quota", "simple quota", and
> "full quota" enable.  Only the simple-quota path is ever exercised by
> this test, so the dispatch is dead weight and the indirection just
> obscures the actual btrfs command being run.
> 
> Inline the two call sites to call 'btrfs quota enable --simple'
> directly and drop the helper.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <[email protected]>
> ---

Hahah, to be honest, the title '[PATCH 0/2] squota delete fstests' gave me
a minor heart attack. I thought it was a critical bug report about fstests
accidentally deleting itself while running :-D

>  tests/btrfs/301 | 14 ++------------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/301 b/tests/btrfs/301
> index 1f72a97b..31243aab 100755
> --- a/tests/btrfs/301
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/301
> @@ -169,16 +169,6 @@ do_enospc_falloc()
>  	do_falloc $file $sz
>  }
>  
> -enable_quota()
> -{
> -	local mode=$1
> -
> -	[ $mode == "n" ] && return
> -	arg=$([ $mode == "s" ] && echo "--simple")
> -
> -	$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG quota enable $arg $SCRATCH_MNT
> -}
> -
>  get_subvid()
>  {
>  	_btrfs_get_subvolid $SCRATCH_MNT subv
> @@ -198,7 +188,7 @@ prepare()
>  {
>  	_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full
>  	_scratch_mount
> -	enable_quota "s"
> +	$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG quota enable --simple $SCRATCH_MNT
>  	$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume create $subv >> $seqres.full
>  	local subvid=$(get_subvid)
>  	set_subvol_limit $subvid $limit
> @@ -421,7 +411,7 @@ enable_mature()
>  	# Sync before enabling squotas to reliably *not* count the writes
>  	# we did before enabling.
>  	sync
> -	enable_quota "s"
> +	$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG quota enable --simple $SCRATCH_MNT

This change doesn't seem related to patch 2/2. I think we can review
these 2 patches separately.

For this patch, I'm fine with or without it. If the btrfs list prefers
to have it, or move it to be a common helper, I'm good with that.

Thanks,
Zorro

>  	set_subvol_limit $subvid $limit
>  	_scratch_cycle_mount
>  	usage=$(get_subvol_usage $subvid)
> -- 
> 2.54.0
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.