Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: inline enable_quota helper in test 301
Zorro Lang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.fstests,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <agU-k5OnlkvcLiFB@zlang-mailbox> |
On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 05:43:33PM -0700, Boris Burkov wrote:
> The enable_quota helper in btrfs/301 takes a mode argument ('n', 's',
> or anything else) to switch between "no quota", "simple quota", and
> "full quota" enable. Only the simple-quota path is ever exercised by
> this test, so the dispatch is dead weight and the indirection just
> obscures the actual btrfs command being run.
>
> Inline the two call sites to call 'btrfs quota enable --simple'
> directly and drop the helper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <[email protected]>
> ---
Hahah, to be honest, the title '[PATCH 0/2] squota delete fstests' gave me
a minor heart attack. I thought it was a critical bug report about fstests
accidentally deleting itself while running :-D
> tests/btrfs/301 | 14 ++------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/301 b/tests/btrfs/301
> index 1f72a97b..31243aab 100755
> --- a/tests/btrfs/301
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/301
> @@ -169,16 +169,6 @@ do_enospc_falloc()
> do_falloc $file $sz
> }
>
> -enable_quota()
> -{
> - local mode=$1
> -
> - [ $mode == "n" ] && return
> - arg=$([ $mode == "s" ] && echo "--simple")
> -
> - $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG quota enable $arg $SCRATCH_MNT
> -}
> -
> get_subvid()
> {
> _btrfs_get_subvolid $SCRATCH_MNT subv
> @@ -198,7 +188,7 @@ prepare()
> {
> _scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full
> _scratch_mount
> - enable_quota "s"
> + $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG quota enable --simple $SCRATCH_MNT
> $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume create $subv >> $seqres.full
> local subvid=$(get_subvid)
> set_subvol_limit $subvid $limit
> @@ -421,7 +411,7 @@ enable_mature()
> # Sync before enabling squotas to reliably *not* count the writes
> # we did before enabling.
> sync
> - enable_quota "s"
> + $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG quota enable --simple $SCRATCH_MNT
This change doesn't seem related to patch 2/2. I think we can review
these 2 patches separately.
For this patch, I'm fine with or without it. If the btrfs list prefers
to have it, or move it to be a common helper, I'm good with that.
Thanks,
Zorro
> set_subvol_limit $subvid $limit
> _scratch_cycle_mount
> usage=$(get_subvol_usage $subvid)
> --
> 2.54.0
>
>